NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
Sysadmin shock as Windows Server 2025 installs itself after labeling error (theregister.com)
Animats 3 hours ago [-]
"or paying for the required license?"

Where was the acceptance of a contract requiring that? Microsoft just gave people a free upgrade.

PittleyDunkin 42 minutes ago [-]
I imagine the definition of "upgrade" depends on the needs of the customer. The merchant of the license is inherently unable to evaluate this. Installing software without explicit consent, especially not-functionally-equivalent-software, is inherently wrong.
causality0 11 minutes ago [-]
It's amazing to me that we're all so chill about a company in Redmond having root access to our PCs because they pinky-swear they will never misuse it.
ranger_danger 8 minutes ago [-]
And yet when you call it what it is (a backdoor) people get highly offended. Same thing with ubuntu snaps or really anything that updates automatically.
gnabgib 3 hours ago [-]
Discussion (75 points, 18 hours ago, 26 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42057451
ahoka 3 hours ago [-]
“installs itself” = a 3rd party patch management product installed the update
Brian_K_White 2 hours ago [-]
A 3rd party tool did what MS told it to do.
heraldgeezer 2 hours ago [-]
Or if you auto approve security updates. As is common. Azure VMs even default to auto-update pulls from MS.

https://imgur.com/a/RvEx3yn

troseph 3 hours ago [-]
David Attenborough voiced "Sysadmins are cautious by nature" in my head.
mattsimpson 23 minutes ago [-]
We got an urgent notice today from our central IT group warning of this catastrophic screw up of epic proportions, and I could hardly believe it.

This is way worse than the Crowdstrike debacle.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 02:56:33 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.