Surprisingly funny! AI is often unfunny when it tries to be funny, I wonder why this is better.
zaptrem 444 days ago [-]
We wondered the same thing! I wonder which model they’re using.
pixelsort 444 days ago [-]
Ha! Okay, I laughed at "computational phrenology".
malshe 444 days ago [-]
Hilarious! This can potentially go viral
yannigk 444 days ago [-]
Haha these are amazing! I love them!
lagrange77 444 days ago [-]
That's a really interesting application of LLMs and manim.
My problem with it, as with LLMs in general, is that i can't fully trust it. This isn't a problem with topics you know well.
But those 3b1b style tutorials are meant to build an understanding or mental model of a concept for people who don't know it well yet.
I'm afraid that, if the output is (partially) wrong, watching such a video could be even harmful in understanding the concept, because your 'greenfield' brain may pick up pieces of it that made sense to it.
jrussino 445 days ago [-]
FYI for the input "Graph a cartoid and explain it" I get a correct definition and some interesting facts/properties (in spite of the fact that I mis-remembered the name of the object I had in mind; it should have been "cardioid"). But then it tries to provide a plot, and the plot has an error:
```
Error
Please check your input:
Undefined variable
heta
```
Looks like there's a "theta" that's being incorrectly truncated, or something to that effect.
I refreshed a few times and found that I consistently saw this same error.
yannigk 444 days ago [-]
I was able to replicate your error and pushed a fix, it should be working pretty reliably now for equations that include theta. Let me know if it works for you!
It's pretty good! It did quite well when asked a variant of "when do the trains meet" problem, although it used different values for speed than what I told it to use (and what it actually used in textual response: 120km/h and 20km/h in video vs 80km/h and 60km/h in the prompt and textual response).
If it did the animations in 3Blue1Brown style, that would be cherry on the top! ;-)
Edit: I did notice it uses Manim, it just doesn't have the same feeling
xenonite 443 days ago [-]
Sadly the resulting calculation is wrong (190/140≠1.5)
mlukaszek 443 days ago [-]
Haha I did not even register that as I expected 1.5 as the answer...
bassrattle 444 days ago [-]
As a test, I input a2b2. It interpretted that as a^2xb^2 which is fine but it kept pronouncing "A squared" as "a square" (more phonetically, "uh square")
For a tool meant to enlighten, hearing "a square be square" was confusing.
Alifatisk 444 days ago [-]
I am so happy tools like these gets created and is available for free.
When growing up, I had difficulty learning math and I wasn't able to ask my parents for help so much. That is when I found PhotoMath, it changed my life, it became my second teacher and it was for free! I don't think Google even owned it at the time.
I remember being very scared of losing it one day. Luckily that never happened, but I will never forget how much these math tools helped me growing up.
8n4vidtmkvmk 444 days ago [-]
Neat, but I think I'd like it better if you simplified it and dropped the focus on teaching students. What I'd prefer is a slightly smarter WolframAlpha that doesn't force me to learn their weird syntax. Let me ask my math question in English, you turn that into a formula and just give me the solution. I don't need the explanation.
The video generation is overly ambitious. Some of them come out wonky and wrong.
pino999 444 days ago [-]
I don't know, it is still chatgpt. I wouldn't let it near homework soon. I do enjoy the latex rendering.
Anyway it can't even solve x mod 66 = 3 (answer: x = 3 + 66k, where k = 0, 1, ...)
Somehow it thinks the answer is 32 and it comes with a huge blob of shit.
yannigk 444 days ago [-]
Thanks for the feedback. We can improve the model's focus on the task at hand and/or ask for more details if doesn't have enough context. With a bit more clarification, MathGPT outputs your answer: https://math-gpt.org/?problem_text=solve%20x%20mod%2066%20%3....
fph 444 days ago [-]
Very neat! Can created content be reused freely by teachers? Do you require attribution? I am interested in tikz plots more than in videos, personally.
freakynit 445 days ago [-]
Holy cow this is insanely wonderful. Extremely beautiful explanation of concepts. The generated videos are like professionally hard-crafted. Great work!
j_bum 444 days ago [-]
Any examples? I’ve tried several prompts and get errors each time the plotting begins
freakynit 444 days ago [-]
I tried following:
1. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
2. Principal component analysis
3. Low rank matrices
IndieCoder 444 days ago [-]
Kudos for the UI, very nice to see the seamless integration of formulas, graphs and videos!
yannigk 444 days ago [-]
Thank you!
vivzkestrel 444 days ago [-]
it says .org in the domain. Is this a "for-profit" privately operated company or some experiment with GPT? did you guys build your own proprietary model or is it using some open source LLM model?
sprobertson 443 days ago [-]
Very cool, how does it work? (even if just at a high level)
Jzush 443 days ago [-]
I tried it on a simple problem and generated the video thinking I would get a video that would go through the steps of division. Instead it said "Let's take number XX and divide it by number YY using a calculator to get the result ZZ".
I'm thinking, wait a tick, you're the calculator. Weren't you supposed to show your work? It's that literally the point?
It's a funny utility but I'm not sure it's all that useful.
T3RMINATED 444 days ago [-]
[dead]
Rendered at 06:25:25 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
How Jeb! Won the election: https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=b9e16dbd-cab6-44e3-a393-f255b...
Mathematical proof AI is doomed: https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=c5745f99-b1d1-4c57-8a93-6fe3b...
My problem with it, as with LLMs in general, is that i can't fully trust it. This isn't a problem with topics you know well. But those 3b1b style tutorials are meant to build an understanding or mental model of a concept for people who don't know it well yet. I'm afraid that, if the output is (partially) wrong, watching such a video could be even harmful in understanding the concept, because your 'greenfield' brain may pick up pieces of it that made sense to it.
``` Error Please check your input: Undefined variable heta ```
Looks like there's a "theta" that's being incorrectly truncated, or something to that effect.
I refreshed a few times and found that I consistently saw this same error.
https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=a7489ec5-b06e-480a-96c4-27765...
If it did the animations in 3Blue1Brown style, that would be cherry on the top! ;-)
Edit: I did notice it uses Manim, it just doesn't have the same feeling
For a tool meant to enlighten, hearing "a square be square" was confusing.
When growing up, I had difficulty learning math and I wasn't able to ask my parents for help so much. That is when I found PhotoMath, it changed my life, it became my second teacher and it was for free! I don't think Google even owned it at the time.
I remember being very scared of losing it one day. Luckily that never happened, but I will never forget how much these math tools helped me growing up.
The video generation is overly ambitious. Some of them come out wonky and wrong.
Anyway it can't even solve x mod 66 = 3 (answer: x = 3 + 66k, where k = 0, 1, ...)
Somehow it thinks the answer is 32 and it comes with a huge blob of shit.
1. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
2. Principal component analysis
3. Low rank matrices
I'm thinking, wait a tick, you're the calculator. Weren't you supposed to show your work? It's that literally the point?
It's a funny utility but I'm not sure it's all that useful.