Shrek Retold https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pM70TROZQsI is a similar fan-made reproduction, but it's way more polished. The movie is split into roughly 1min sections, with each one done by a different creator. The quality is all over the place, in a hilarious way. One minute it's produced by a professional animator nailing the scenes, then the next minute it's people goofing around in their backyard.
lloeki 18 days ago [-]
I believe the trendsetter was Star Wars Uncut, made of 15s slices:
I love the differences between those three movies (The Free Movie, Shrek Retold and Star Wars Uncut).
Star Wars really looks like a work of love. Shrek looks like a work of love that tries it's best to not take itself seriously. Free Movie looks like a bizarre troll post.
While this is coherent with each movie's tone itself, and perhaps with the time each "demaster" was made (I don't know, I didn't check), I feel like this is most coherent with how each movie is viewed by the community:
- Star Wars is a beloved movie, with a huge honest fan base. Thus, it was remade with love and attention to detail.
- Shrek is a beloved movie, but doesn't take itself seriously in the first place, and is also a meme. Thus it was remade with love, but trying hard to look like it's a troll.
- Bee Movie is mainly a meme, isn't AFAIK a beloved movie, and its fan base is mostly made of memers and trolls. Thus it was low-effortly remade at this non-flattering image.
Freak_NL 18 days ago [-]
> Bee Movie is mainly a meme, isn't AFAIK a beloved movie, […]
All you had to do was add one more 'e'. What a senseless waste of a pun…
johnnyanmac 18 days ago [-]
Bee movie has more of a cult fanbase at best. It's still Seinfeld, and the jokes aged surprisingly well.
But there's only so far you can get with a story of a bee breaking out of his natural programming,followed by a bee-human romance, followed by said bee suing humanity for stealing bee-kind's honey. You can't even truly explain the plot without breaking it down into 3 episodes.
It's a surprisingly good benchmark to ask "is it better than Bee movie" when measuring other Dreamworks movies against themselves.
soperj 18 days ago [-]
You forgot the part where the bees then sit around and do nothing after getting all their honey back. It's basically a diatribe against universal basic income, since without the incentive to slave away for the rest of their lives, their lives become meaningless.
cf100clunk 18 days ago [-]
> Star Wars is a beloved movie, with a huge honest fan base. Thus, it was remade with love and attention to detail.
Agreed. Star Wars Uncut exists because devotees wanted to set the record straight regarding controversial changes in later versions, and their efforts were laudable. Still, the image and sound quality cannot match the latest, greatest studio versions, so watching Uncut versions on the newest home theatre gear means accepting the warts and all.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine's remaster was also a labour of love but with a different purpose (image clarity and upscaling):
I believe you are confusing Star Wars Uncut with Star Wars Despecialized Edition. Image and sound quality are far, far away from the first thing I would point out when distinguishing Uncut from the studio masters.
cf100clunk 16 days ago [-]
Thank you, I did indeed mistake one for the other.
The Robocop remake was my first thought. Some of those scenes are hilarious.
asabla 18 days ago [-]
Some of the most goofiest scenes reminded me about my self growing up, recording dumb re-creations of movies/tv-shows with friends.
I had a blast watching that! thank you for sharing.
tzs 18 days ago [-]
Similar is "South Park Reanimated: The List" [1]. From the description:
> 6 years, 175 animators, 260 unique scenes, 1 copyright dispute, and a lot of love-- we are proud to finally present the South Park Reanimated Project! We are so grateful for everyone who participated and made this such an amazing recreation. We hope you enjoy!
also featuring a great reimagining of I'm A Believer by Hot Dad :)
ikesau 18 days ago [-]
I drew a few frames in this, but it was a real shame to see how little quality control there was in the final cut. Makes it kind of unwatchable.
Progress near the end was really fast, as lots of people had caught on and were racing to get as many frames in as possible.
I really don't think this concept has been worn out yet, and someone could make their own version of this with a small review step and then we'd get some fun, actually watchable hand-drawn movies :)
sjf 17 days ago [-]
You’re right, I can’t believe they didn’t cut frames that are totally unrelated, there so many left in that are just scribbles or text.
I just tried making some frames for the dune remake. The editor is so hard to use. I can only draw a one pixel line with no smoothing. It’s really laggy/glitchy. I can barely even make out what the original frame is because it’s in grayscale with an overlay. I got one frame that could have been a landscape of snow and rocks, or it could have been sand dunes, or water. I have no idea, it was just gray and white blobs.
I get that they are going for a retro style, but even MS paint had different size brushes.
It’s such a cool idea, I wish the tooling was better.
ElCapitanMarkla 17 days ago [-]
What would be interesting is if multiple submissions could be made for each frame, and you could rank each.
You could build a version of the best frames every year and watch it progress.
kevingadd 18 days ago [-]
From a few moments of watching, it seems like over half the crowd-sourced frames are just trolling and not actually a representation of the original film. I guess that kind of adds to the aesthetic, but I'm a little surprised they kept those troll frames...
doubled112 18 days ago [-]
For at least a few seconds it was an odd game of phallus or frame.
18 days ago [-]
jsight 17 days ago [-]
Yeah, there really needed to be some voting or other feedback system to encourage consistency over time.
This is a mildly interesting experiment that largely just looks like a failure at the moment.
lukevp 18 days ago [-]
Yeah I agree, there should be a voting system that can kick out bogus frames and have someone remake them, would be really interesting to see what it’d look like if everyone was trying to recreate it. Kind of like rotoscoping I suppose. As it is, there’s just a ton of discontinuity because of the troll frames.
chem83 18 days ago [-]
I imagine that trolls would eventually band together to try to steamroll the voting system like it happens on r/Place. Maybe.
nielsole 18 days ago [-]
If votes are attributable, such voting rings should be easily detectable
pcblues 18 days ago [-]
This is a fascinating idea. Sort of like a wikipedia, but trying to establish the truth of a single movie rather than everything we know.
It would probably end up needing moderators, harassing people for funding, and pay for political purposes as well as its core reason for existing :)
Reviving1514 18 days ago [-]
This is amazing. I love that this exists. I'm surprised how negative some of the comments are.
SV_BubbleTime 18 days ago [-]
I skipped to a random spot, and lasted about 5 seconds. Two drawings of dicks, 50% scribbles, and a couple frames of just the word PENIS. Yes, this is truly a noteworthy effort.
I’m as equally curious as you, just on the other side of the horseshoe.
polonbike 18 days ago [-]
Same here. If you skip to a random part of the movie, and move frame by frame, it becomes a game of "spot the penis". Just one or two can be "tolerated", but we're far from that here, so ... My opinion is that it does not really belong in HN
andybak 18 days ago [-]
> My opinion is that it does not really belong in HN
It's a fascinating tech/social experiment. It belongs on HN because it was done and the outcome is what it is.
If you actually want to watch the Bee Movie then watch the original. I doubt generating a watchable alternative was behind anyone's motivation in this.
filcuk 18 days ago [-]
Because of a penis drawing? Are we in preschool? There have been those ever since caveman times.
robertlagrant 18 days ago [-]
I think the point is we're not in preschool, nor are we cave(wo)men, so we don't need the penis drawings.
gopher_space 18 days ago [-]
A penis drawing isn't something that's needed, it's something that happens. Feel free to rail against them in a Kanute-like manner, but learning to cock an eyebrow and say "yeah, that figures" can be self-preserving.
For what it's worth I too prefer the plausible deniability of Georgia O'Keefe's outrageous lies. It's a more sensible chuckle.
robertlagrant 18 days ago [-]
No-one's railing against anything.
gopher_space 17 days ago [-]
I was hoping to introduce my old “donging through the millennia” thesis work and ride that hobby horse around the room a little :(
shermantanktop 18 days ago [-]
Did the caveman Bee Movie have penises in it? Because then you’d have a really good point.
aceazzameen 18 days ago [-]
I'm sure this one had an absurdly short TTP (time to penis).
astura 18 days ago [-]
>I'm surprised how negative some of the comments are.
It's literally unwatchable - It's 85% scribbles and "jokes."
tyleo 18 days ago [-]
I can understand the negativity because this only appeals to specific sensibilities.
I admit that it’s low brow but it hits my fascination the exact right way. To me there is something special about so many people being organized around something so mundane.
eigenblake 18 days ago [-]
We could probably fine-tune a tiny convolutional neutral net image classifier and just hold on the last good frames for longer to cover the frames with clear trolling and nsfw images.
BriggyDwiggs42 18 days ago [-]
I think that would miss the point
mkagenius 18 days ago [-]
No, that point was already made. This will be a new point unlike the previous point.
BriggyDwiggs42 18 days ago [-]
But i like the previous point. Why would you take it from me?
I-M-S 18 days ago [-]
It's not taking away, a new point is by definition adding. Just like The Free Movie added to The Bee Movie.
BriggyDwiggs42 17 days ago [-]
I think it would be subtractive. To my eye, it seems like the point of the project was to celebrate the free expression of the crowd. The lack of censorship and filtering is core to the purpose of the project. If you start filtering out individual contributions in order to more accurately reconstruct the original movie, then I don’t really get why you wouldn’t just pirate the movie.
binary_slinger 18 days ago [-]
Who is going to put each frame into image to image AI model and get out a photorealistic output and recompile?
cafeinux 18 days ago [-]
Lots of photorealistic phalluses are going to be generated.
davidmurdoch 18 days ago [-]
Only if you're using a model trained on them
RankingMember 18 days ago [-]
I think it would be against the spirit of the project not to do so
Terretta 17 days ago [-]
I've read white papers seemingly claiming with the right prompt these sketches would turn into the indicated art.
Back when I was first playing around with AI, I built a website where people could upload fine tuned GlowTTS and Tacotron2 text to speech model weights.
One of the first things users did was to emit the entire transcript of the Bee Movie:
I never watched or read the series but my wife was watching it (last week actually), I passed by and saw a chase scene where they were shooting from their wands at each other and I made a comment like "Oh, it's Jason Bourne for kids.. now I see the appeal"
r-w 18 days ago [-]
Epilepsy warning please! :-)
bytematic 18 days ago [-]
would be cool without all the trolling
smolder 18 days ago [-]
Better in concept than execution, for sure. I feel bad for the people that actually drew their frames competently.
ternnoburn 18 days ago [-]
The execution is part of the art of it, like, there's a statement being made about the Internet, anonymity, and humanity here. It may not be what the artist originally set out to create with their art, which I find fascinating.
Nice idea, but I’m struggling to remember myself ever having consumed so many different pictures of dicks over the course of five minutes.
tuanx5 18 days ago [-]
Reminiscent of Shrek Retold
Deprogrammer9 18 days ago [-]
Thanks for making me watch that? WTF
ashoeafoot 17 days ago [-]
life finds a way to preserve around the cultural death that is copyright
renewiltord 18 days ago [-]
I watched 5 seconds and it was garbage. Felt like /dev/random
imdsm 18 days ago [-]
I clicked randomly, at 00:37:09 and got a penis
brianbest101 18 days ago [-]
[dead]
GrantMoyer 18 days ago [-]
I can certainly see why many commenters here find this many dicks hard to swallow, but when I take them wholly with the rest of the work, I find they come together satisfyingly and rawly defile copyright and DRM.
Rendered at 05:49:54 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
https://www.starwarsuncut.com/
Which I now realise I never watched in full...
While this is coherent with each movie's tone itself, and perhaps with the time each "demaster" was made (I don't know, I didn't check), I feel like this is most coherent with how each movie is viewed by the community:
- Star Wars is a beloved movie, with a huge honest fan base. Thus, it was remade with love and attention to detail.
- Shrek is a beloved movie, but doesn't take itself seriously in the first place, and is also a meme. Thus it was remade with love, but trying hard to look like it's a troll.
- Bee Movie is mainly a meme, isn't AFAIK a beloved movie, and its fan base is mostly made of memers and trolls. Thus it was low-effortly remade at this non-flattering image.
All you had to do was add one more 'e'. What a senseless waste of a pun…
But there's only so far you can get with a story of a bee breaking out of his natural programming,followed by a bee-human romance, followed by said bee suing humanity for stealing bee-kind's honey. You can't even truly explain the plot without breaking it down into 3 episodes.
It's a surprisingly good benchmark to ask "is it better than Bee movie" when measuring other Dreamworks movies against themselves.
Agreed. Star Wars Uncut exists because devotees wanted to set the record straight regarding controversial changes in later versions, and their efforts were laudable. Still, the image and sound quality cannot match the latest, greatest studio versions, so watching Uncut versions on the newest home theatre gear means accepting the warts and all.
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine's remaster was also a labour of love but with a different purpose (image clarity and upscaling):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19453745
Note that this isn't really a fan-remake as it's professional actors but with the spliced scenes but it's pretty entertaining.
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt3528906/
Worth a watch with friends present: https://vimeo.com/85903713
I had a blast watching that! thank you for sharing.
> 6 years, 175 animators, 260 unique scenes, 1 copyright dispute, and a lot of love-- we are proud to finally present the South Park Reanimated Project! We are so grateful for everyone who participated and made this such an amazing recreation. We hope you enjoy!
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QXX6AnO0nI
Progress near the end was really fast, as lots of people had caught on and were racing to get as many frames in as possible.
I really don't think this concept has been worn out yet, and someone could make their own version of this with a small review step and then we'd get some fun, actually watchable hand-drawn movies :)
I just tried making some frames for the dune remake. The editor is so hard to use. I can only draw a one pixel line with no smoothing. It’s really laggy/glitchy. I can barely even make out what the original frame is because it’s in grayscale with an overlay. I got one frame that could have been a landscape of snow and rocks, or it could have been sand dunes, or water. I have no idea, it was just gray and white blobs.
I get that they are going for a retro style, but even MS paint had different size brushes.
It’s such a cool idea, I wish the tooling was better.
You could build a version of the best frames every year and watch it progress.
This is a mildly interesting experiment that largely just looks like a failure at the moment.
It would probably end up needing moderators, harassing people for funding, and pay for political purposes as well as its core reason for existing :)
I’m as equally curious as you, just on the other side of the horseshoe.
It's a fascinating tech/social experiment. It belongs on HN because it was done and the outcome is what it is.
If you actually want to watch the Bee Movie then watch the original. I doubt generating a watchable alternative was behind anyone's motivation in this.
For what it's worth I too prefer the plausible deniability of Georgia O'Keefe's outrageous lies. It's a more sensible chuckle.
It's literally unwatchable - It's 85% scribbles and "jokes."
I admit that it’s low brow but it hits my fascination the exact right way. To me there is something special about so many people being organized around something so mundane.
That would be quite the compression scheme.
The Free Movie - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36687399 - July 2023 (100 comments)
One of the first things users did was to emit the entire transcript of the Bee Movie:
https://youtu.be/0_ToJXHnVFQ?si=qfMNuJXAHW-hWSz5
Harry Potter and the Deathly Weapons -- Harry Potter With Guns
https://harrypotterwithguns.com/