It's a great product overall! However, as others have mentioned, if it can't be open source and requires granting strong permissions, I'm concerned about the security implications.
richin13 5 days ago [-]
Any plans to open source it?
djyde 5 days ago [-]
Sorry, no. I'm an indie developer so I wish I can make some money with it. It would be a fair price as I wrote on landing page, will less than $20/year.
But I can share the tech stack I use:
- WXT: the browser extension framework
- Vercel AI SDK. Both SDK core and SDK UI. I wrote a bridge that I can proxy the api request to background script which compat with the SDK streaming protocol, so that I can use the SDK UI.
- Next.js: for the landing page and the up coming cloud service (e.g. prompt sync)
- Strapi: headless cms.
richin13 5 days ago [-]
Fair enough. I asked because an extension like this has access to too much information which I don't like from a privacy stand point.
Thanks for sharing though!
djyde 4 days ago [-]
I understand your concern. I think "access to much information" means this extension require <all_url> host_permission, which I don't want to either but it must.
Because custom AI provider's API base url is submit by user. If I want to call the API on background script, this base url must be listed on host_permissions. Otherwise it will cause a CORS problem.
optional_host_permissions may fix this problem, but since the base url is set by user, it's not possible to use this workaround.
Any suggestion?
tough 4 days ago [-]
you could give paying customers access to the code to run themselves (not open source)
if that works for you/your privacy-aware customer they can inspect the code/build it/ run their own version
djyde 4 days ago [-]
Actually, the nice thing about chrome extensions is that users can view all requests made by content_script and background script through devtool. This is much more intuitive than checking the code.
Ylpertnodi 4 days ago [-]
>will less than $20/year.
I'd rather pay more, once, than another* subscription.
*Of which, I have reduced to two: phone plan [€5.99pcm], and mullvad [€5.00pcm].
No more.
djyde 5 days ago [-]
Hi hackers. I wrote an AI browser extension for chat with page.
I know there are many existing tools like this. But every existed tools require me login before using it and I must use their AI models (which is the way they make money).
So I write my own tools for it. The key features are:
- No need to login, just use it
- Use your own AI API key
- Use your own custom prompt
- Chat run entirely within the browser, without passing through any third-party servers
mayne 5 days ago [-]
It looks good
r6jg9oopm 4 days ago [-]
[flagged]
Rendered at 09:44:30 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/ai-chatbot
But I can share the tech stack I use:
- WXT: the browser extension framework
- Vercel AI SDK. Both SDK core and SDK UI. I wrote a bridge that I can proxy the api request to background script which compat with the SDK streaming protocol, so that I can use the SDK UI.
- Next.js: for the landing page and the up coming cloud service (e.g. prompt sync)
- Strapi: headless cms.
Thanks for sharing though!
Because custom AI provider's API base url is submit by user. If I want to call the API on background script, this base url must be listed on host_permissions. Otherwise it will cause a CORS problem.
optional_host_permissions may fix this problem, but since the base url is set by user, it's not possible to use this workaround.
Any suggestion?
if that works for you/your privacy-aware customer they can inspect the code/build it/ run their own version
I'd rather pay more, once, than another* subscription.
*Of which, I have reduced to two: phone plan [€5.99pcm], and mullvad [€5.00pcm].
No more.
I know there are many existing tools like this. But every existed tools require me login before using it and I must use their AI models (which is the way they make money).
So I write my own tools for it. The key features are:
- No need to login, just use it
- Use your own AI API key
- Use your own custom prompt
- Chat run entirely within the browser, without passing through any third-party servers