If you're looking for a 'click-through' experience, the JKU vis lab has long provided some awesome tools and visuals (ca. 2009) for interacting with the human genome[0][1].

[0]: https://jku-vds-lab.at/tools/

[1]: https://jku-vds-lab.at/publications/2009_bioinformatics_cale...

Any grounding in medical truth/ is anything sourced to legitimate references or is this entirely pulled from the model's general training of human anatomy?

I wasn't sure what to expect, so I opened a random bit of the code.

                Some(Ancestry::Ashkenazi) => Self {
                    ancestry,
                    lactose_restricted: false,
                    alcohol_restriction_level: AlcoholRestrictionLevel::Moderate,
                    vitamin_d_supplementation_iu: 800.0,
                    recommended_foods: vec![
                        "Fish".to_string(),
                        "Whole grains".to_string(),
                        "Vegetables".to_string(),
                        "Olive oil".to_string(),
                        "Nuts".to_string(),
                    ],
                    foods_to_limit: vec![
                        "High-fat dairy".to_string(),
                        "Processed meats".to_string(),
                    ],

Now this seems to mix a couple of things in the same module: I would suggest to separate out dietary views from a model of the human body and its genetic heritage.

Scientific views may change over time based on new results, and even body properties like blood pressure or BMI are not constant per person but bound to vary; so perhaps a Body should be modeled as a view or snapshot of a set of time series?

I would like to encourage you to take a scientist's view: if you had not just one (your own) but two models, how would you evaluate which is "better" - in other words the evaluation question. You could set a particular task and perhaps finding out something works better with your model than with a full-text index of the textbook you used and a simple Lucene search interface?

Are you planning to connect your model to any kind of visualization? Should be useful.

This project reminds me of Matt Might's work (predating LLMs) on using techniques from Precision Medicine to help his son, who had a rare disease.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt3XyeFHvt4 (poorly transcribed here: https://www.janestreet.com/tech-talks/algorithm-for-precisio...)

If I recall correctly, he used miniKanren along with formalized, structured data extracted from medical research. Unfortunately, his son has since passed away.

How do we know this is accurate and not some big hallucination? Is the data sourced anywhere? Has anyone with a relevant background even skimmed through the code? It seems like a great idea in theory, but this execution is worrying.

I think it's time to learn to stop publishing clearly fully AI generated "projects." Anyone can pull up CC and type "model the human body in Rust," or whatever.

I wonder how much it would cost to pay a domain expert to review 95k lines of code. As a domain expert who codes for fun and loves rust, I can only say the answer is, "A lot."

Clickable? Like a... Hyperlink?

After the "this meeting could have been an email", we get the "code could have been html"

For a physical spin on this sort of thing in OpenSCAD, see:

https://github.com/davidson16807/relativity.scad/wiki/Human-...

the absurd things people come up with to meet their own needs are usually good indicators of products and services which want to exist

Maybe this is the future. But I dread looking at perfectly formatted yet sterile readme with too many emojis for comfort.

I have an Asian friend that gets flushed when drinking, but I didn't know it was an Asian thing. TIL

updates on learnings - the feed back from hn about ground truths was helpful passed this thread into the ai and it started to base truth on exa search. - it produced alot of slop so it added a review cycle to remove alot of the slop. - it worked out it was doing performative work then removed the data as code and moved this to toml. it then started to focus heavy on processes and doing things like the ALDH2 metabolic process.

honest take - decent at getting a quick understanding of what the ALDH2 process is like but struggles with harder modelling, the experiment gave better insights into ai then medical. (slop is countable with exa mcp (ground truthing, research, anti hallucinations).