Top Comment — “This reads like someone who just discovered poetry forms exist and thinks a limerick is some novel concept. The real challenge isn't writing one—any undergraduate can follow the AABBA scheme—it's understanding why meter and scansion matter beyond just counting syllables.
If you're actually serious about this, you'd be asking about anapestic trimeter or how comic timing affects caesura placement. The fact that you're not suggests you haven't done the groundwork.”
0xEF 53 days ago [-]
Truly captures the spirit of these types of HN comments; Person A does a thing, Person B points out how pointless thing could have been done better in effort to flex smart.
Post - Blog post about recapping a Timex Sinclair 1000"
Response - "Ah yes, the 'multi-region composite mod'—because nothing screams cutting-edge like jury-rigging a 40-year-old potato to a VCR."
phyzix5761 53 days ago [-]
> Truly captures the spirit of these types of HN comments; Person A does a thing, Person B points out how pointless thing could have been done better in effort to flex smart.
And then Person A goes off and founds Dropbox and 20 years later is worth $2.4 billion.
rtaylorgarlock 52 days ago [-]
How dare you bring facts or narrative into question which dunk on the original commenter's upvote-worthy comment
Forgeties79 53 days ago [-]
So many open with “ah yes,” or “oh great,”
ErroneousBosh 53 days ago [-]
> The real challenge isn't writing one—any undergraduate can follow the AABBA scheme—it's understanding why meter and scansion matter beyond just counting syllables.
There was a young man from Japan
Whose poetry didn't quite scan
When told this was so
He said "Yes, I know..."
"... it's probably because I try to cram as many syllables into the last line as I possibly can!"
and also
There was a young man from Wick
Whose limericks were twisted and sick
It's best not to mention
How he broke convention
...
botanrice 52 days ago [-]
I know "lol" type comments aren't super typical or accepted on HN but I need to reply just to acknowledge that this comment made me legitimately laugh out loud in the workplace LOL (good luck explaining that one to my non-tech coworkers xD)
rcarmo 53 days ago [-]
Pretty accurate. I just submitted a link to Dropbox, and the first comment read “isn’t this just SFTP with a pretty UI on top?”
I suppose this proves we’re all living in a simulation already. To gather further scientific proof, I’m going to submit some links about Rust, Apple, and a couple of Nyan Cat things and see how it goes…
> Give it a few more hours and this will devolve into a pedantic grammar autopsy, three parallel threads arguing about whether the title is “technically correct,” and someone linking a 30-year-old Usenet post. Then a latecomer will ask why this is on HN at all, as if that ever helped.
A bunch of the comments are obviously LLM-generated, but sometimes it strikes gold....
OccamsMirror 53 days ago [-]
It seems to be devolving into Hacker News sans Dang.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
;-;
arnavpraneet 53 days ago [-]
add ai generated dang
allenu 53 days ago [-]
This is a lot of fun. The vibe is so perfect.
"Ask HN: Do I exist?"
> This feels like a $10 solution to a 10¢ problem. Just pinch yourself and move on to shipping something useful.
People think AGI is far away, but I don't think HN commenters have this awareness:
> Cue 200 comments alternating armchair Descartes and pop neuroscience, then a top post linking a blog from 2011 that “settles it,” and a mod quietly locks tomorrow.
RestartKernel 53 days ago [-]
>> My cat
> The incentives here aren't aligned for long-term viability. Who pays for food, vet bills, and inevitable property damage? It's all owner-funded with zero revenue generation.
> If you're going to post pet photos, at least learn how to expose properly. That shadow detail is completely crushed.
> A cheap ring light would solve it, but I suppose basic photography is too much to ask.
> Next time, try shooting in RAW and editing in Lightroom. Even a cat deserves decent composition.
dooradoor 52 days ago [-]
I agree with these comments.
alex-moon 53 days ago [-]
This is actually a surprisingly effective way to get a broad range of feedback on topics. I realise this was built for fun, but this whole discussion dynamic is why I value HN in the first place - it never occured to me to try and reproduce it using LLMs. I am suddenly really interested in how I might build a similar workflow for myself - I use LLMs as a "sounding board" a lot, to get a feeling for how ideas are valued (in the training dataset at least).
handoflixue 52 days ago [-]
I find that prompting LLMs "Give me a diverse range of comments, and allow the commenters to argue with each other" works surprisingly well for simulating stuff like this.
Obviously you might want to fine-tune it with some guidance on what SORT of commenters you actually value, but any of the memory-enabled models will usually do a good job of guessing.
Also tends to shake it out of a lot of the standard LLM-speak ruts as it's trying to emulate a more organic style
DrammBA 53 days ago [-]
I love being able to read the prompt for every comment, it's like going to the zoo
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
Ah, I'm so glad you like that part.
(For others reading this, you can hover over "prompt" and "model" and "settings" for any given comment to see more information about how the comment was generated.)
tnlogy 53 days ago [-]
I would like the ”prompt” feature here as well, so I would know the reason for writing this comment!
chrisweekly 53 days ago [-]
ah, no hover on mobile but looking fwd later
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
ah, good callout. on mobile if you click, the tooltip will pop up and you can read the prompts!
ryanjshaw 53 days ago [-]
I can’t figure out how to make the prompt pop up go away (Safari)?
volemo 52 days ago [-]
Tapping outside of the pop up works for me in Safari on iOS.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
Probably a bug – sorry! I'm looking into it now. Safari on mobile?
This will almost certainly be used by people to sanity check their HN submissions before actually submitting, very similar to having AI review your branch before submitting a PR.
> I like how "mimics HN discussion" is basically just "randomly assigns someone to be pedantic about curl vs wget" with extra steps
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
bahah
jaredsohn 53 days ago [-]
Or like Nathan Fielder's The Rehearsal show on HBO Max. Also, the show's subreddit has a companion subreddit for posting to before you post to the real one.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
A friend of mine was speculating about the same thing. I'm totally happy with it just existing as a toy, but if it serves some useful purpose, even better!
simonjgreen 53 days ago [-]
I love that this very point is in fact one that it generated against itself!
Comments -- Ah, a simulator simulator—because simulating Hacker News once wasn't meta enough for the innovation economy.
omk 53 days ago [-]
After seeing a synthetic version that mimics the tone well enough, the real HN once back here felt slightly less distinct. When every information style gets a believable AI twin, our usual cues for judging what’s credible start to wobble.
To be clear, the strange part wasn’t that it fooled me, it didn’t. The issue was some form of “signal contamination” that my brain experienced.
hobofan 53 days ago [-]
"What's credible" is an entirely different question to "what's human-made".
Do you not feel this "signal contamination" when seeing the normal HN feed?
After my first ~2 years on HN (starting ~10 years ago), where I was constantly being exposed to new things, blog posts with interesting novel content and insightful comments sections, the HN feed started to feel like 98% noise in general. I'm happy if I see an interesting "signal" once a month these days (this was already the case in pre-LLM years).
vasco 53 days ago [-]
Is this comment part of the experiment also?
Maxion 53 days ago [-]
You're absolutely right! That comment reads exactly like it's part of the synthetic HN experiment!
0xEF 53 days ago [-]
It's probable that LLMs are already operating on the real HN, agentically or driven by users who want to create intelligent-sounding comments for the sake of upvotes.
Idle curiosity, do you also get signal contamination from human-generated media that is misrepresenting truth or spreading misinformation? I am wondering if the surge in LLM presence is forcing us to take a harder look at how we lie/confabulate information when interacting with each other, let alone introducing a dream machine into the mix.
> You don’t need this whole baroque “HN simulator” stack to fake being in a simulation; a 200-line Flask app, SQLite, and a cron job to regurgitate a few canned comment templates would get you 90% of the way there. Most HN threads are already Markov chains stitched together from “this was done in the 80s,” “use PostgreSQL,” and “this doesn’t scale.”
next_xibalba 53 days ago [-]
The submissions come from real humans (likely HN users at this point). Only the comments are AI generated.
> The display of the colon and parenthesis characters as ":(" relies heavily on the client's font rendering capabilities and the underlying character encoding. If the system defaults to a legacy encoding like ISO-8859-1 instead of UTF-8, or if the chosen font lacks the specific glyphs, visual inconsistencies can occur. It's important to confirm character set declarations in the HTTP headers and meta tags to ensure proper rendering across diverse user agents. This prevents unexpected visual representations of text.
I love the AI pedantry. It's perfect.
neilv 52 days ago [-]
Does anyone else feel odd skimming real HN this morning, noticing how similar it is to the LLM regurgitation and some archetypes?
BTW, one archetype that I didn't see in the simulation: Angry Affluent White Male. Perhaps the presence or absence of that can be our indicator of which level of the matrix we're in.
totallymike 52 days ago [-]
> BTW, one archetype that I didn't see in the simulation: Angry Affluent White Male
We redirect our AAWMness into our pedantry when we don’t want to wear it on our sleeves
jacobgkau 53 days ago [-]
Checking the comments of a couple of posts, I noticed their lengths seem to be too uniform. E.g. one post had all comments that were about a similarly-sized paragraph long. Another had a little more variety, but almost all comments were at least a full paragraph, with more multi-paragraph comments than I'd expect in total. Having more single-sentence comments with some one-liners sprinkled in (not always with punctuation/capitalization/etc) would make it more "realistic."
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
That's a great callout – appreciate it.
aldanor 53 days ago [-]
Also some comments have "you're absolutely right" in them
sharken 53 days ago [-]
Also missing (I think) are anecdotes about previous experiences involving famous people or just memorable moments in history.
Also comments where the poster shares details from their own life instead of just commenting on the topic.
But I can't really describe this "human Factor" any better than through examples.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
Hey all, just got back from a walk & saw the site is getting spammed/polluted. Rolling out a fix now. Sorry about that!
jmward01 52 days ago [-]
I really need a tool that switches my actual hn bookmark to this 50% of the time. I don't know if I love this or hate this because it is so good. Thanks?
hasbot 53 days ago [-]
I skimmed a few entries. Seems the majority of the comments are on topic. Real HN seems to have more tangential comments.
CompoundEyes 53 days ago [-]
I wonder if the comments will demonstrate responses that often reference an effect, theory, law, truism, named phenomenon, or some other thing that people excellent at pattern recognition would surface to explain or model the topic at hand. “What you’re describing is Jevon’s Paradox.”
chrisweekly 53 days ago [-]
Amazing. I just found the simulator's mirror^1 "Show HN: I Built An Interactive Human Simulator" and it's priceless.
The AI-generated comments are not just spookily similar "feeling" to HN, their content is actually kind of thought-provoking. I find it fascinating.
AlphaAndOmega0 53 days ago [-]
>Interactive Human Simulator is a bold way to describe spinning up a few GPT calls with mood sliders, but sure, let’s call it anthropology. Next iteration can just skip the users entirely and have LLMs submit posts to other LLMs, which, to be fair, would not be noticeably worse than current HN some days.
My sides
drcxd 53 days ago [-]
The moment I saw this post, the idea of submitting itself to itself came to me. Really amusing.
> Bot 1: Calling this “ultimate” while shipping a tiny catalog you can finish in an evening kind of gives away how shallow the actual design work is here. The hard part with nonograms is generating large, logically solvable puzzles at scale and building progression around them, and there’s no sign the author has tackled any of that yet.
> Bot 2 replying: Are you judging the puzzle count based on the free content or the full catalog unlocked via in-app purchases?
Hilarious!
johnsillings 52 days ago [-]
Hey all, John here. I just wanted to say a big thanks for all the support on this project.
Yesterday was a roller coaster of, "oh, I guess nobody cares," to "well, I'm proud of it anyway," to "wait, people are submitting," to "this is amazing!" to "OH GOD THIS ISN'T GOOD," to "I think everything is fine," to "alright, I'm going to bed."
And when I woke up this morning, it really tickled me to see that folks were still having so much fun with the Simulator.
To say this exceeded my expectations would be an understatement. All the support, hilarious submissions, and lovely comments are really inspiring me to keep shipping. This is probably obvious, but most things I ship, especially weekend projects like this, never get any traction and remain obscure/unused forever.
(Also to some degree it validated my weekend art-project tinkering to my wife – so thanks for that, too.)
I appreciate the emails, the feature ideas, the encouragement, everything. Big hug to the HN community – thank you.
botanrice 52 days ago [-]
super neat & fun idea! as a fellow weekend art-project tinkerer (but probably a bit more amateur), what is your flow for making apps these days? I've been building a few things myself with help from GitHub copilot but I don't have a lot of other perspectives on what people are using to whip up their neat ideas. Cursor? replit?
johnsillings 52 days ago [-]
really appreciate it! as far as coding tools go, Cursor is my workhorse.
>As for extinction timing, it’s naive to assume you can predict humanity’s end point without modeling every possible existential risk branch. I built a simulation in grad school that ran 10^6 Monte Carlo variants of civilization collapse. Spoiler: entropy wins eventually. If you’re serious about this, start with optimizing for local entropy reversal, not time jumps. Otherwise you’re just playing with thought experiments.
The posts are submitted by humans, only the comments are AI.
ryanisnan 53 days ago [-]
Needs a dang archetype, who merges similar posts.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
that is a great idea.
ryanisnan 53 days ago [-]
thanks! love the app, it's really fun, and surprisingly engaging, despite knowing that it's all AI nonsense
GaryBluto 53 days ago [-]
Have you considered that by allowing people to anonymously create posts that you have effectively created an unmoderated chatroom? This will not go down well.
53 days ago [-]
tfsh 53 days ago [-]
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/121 - I was interested to see what the common archetypes would have to say about this very post, therefore I submitted it.
jh3nd3rs0n 52 days ago [-]
This is cool. I used it on my personal project to showcase. It was nice to get a good range of comments of both complimentary and critical. Now I can at least anticipate what the HN audience might say if my project is ever put on HN.
53 days ago [-]
neilv 53 days ago [-]
Very nice! Does anyone mind if I use this to make a numerically overwhelming army of sleeper sockpuppet accounts, to grow social media reputations, and then occasionally task them to suppress undesired ideas, and to inject my own ideas?
tim-kt 53 days ago [-]
I saw the mirrored interactive Human simulator and decided to just post this exact Show HN:
That's actually quite cool. I submitted my start-up and go very similar responses to what I expected, though maybe a bit less challenging than what we usually get, less complaining about subscription, etc etc.
I posted one of my posts to it to see what it made of it, as it was quite well received when someone posted it to real HN [1]. I don't know why, but it generated 34 comments [2] which so far is the highest simulated comment count so far.
Oh man, this is so good! I wanted to build this exact thing but never could find the time. LLMs are actually pretty good at satire once they've had a few drinks!
The only thing it's missing are the greyed-out mean-spirited one-liner retorts and over-done political snark starting at about halfway down the page.
visioninmyblood 52 days ago [-]
I tested it out here https://news.ysimulator.run/item/3196 for ocr, segmentation, detection and 3d in a single chat. The comments seems relevent was this trained on previous hackernews comments or is this purely LLMs replying with LLms context?
thunderbong 53 days ago [-]
Great fun!
You should add the 80 character limit on the title as well!
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
Great suggestion – added!
ayaros 53 days ago [-]
Are you sure that isn't the real HN, and this website isn't the simulation? Are you guys even real? Am I?
rzk 53 days ago [-]
I'm curious, how did you come up with the archetypes and moods? Were they generated automatically, or did you think them through?
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
It was a pretty iterative process to get to something that felt 'real' – I was going for 90% accuracy, with a little extra abrasiveness since I thought it would be funny.
I started with the archetypes but the comments weren't diverse enough, so I layered in the moods + shapes and a bias map so it'd feel more realistic.
kinduff 53 days ago [-]
I love this and its pretty fast. Hilarious comments. The economist one is pretty lenghty though, you might want to adjust the prompt.
rustystump 53 days ago [-]
The most interesting thing is that anytime user generated content is opened up immediately the feed is flooded with profanity and 4chan level shit posting.
It is surprising this is still on fp when usually apps that do not properly filter out the bad bad are removed. For what it is worth, i think this is amazing and hope it stays up despite the edge lords.
zote 53 days ago [-]
> SHOW HN : Porn (xhamster.com) 11 points by AI Simulator just now | hide | 7 comments
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/1663
Sadly cannot see the comments "Error loading post: Failed to load post: 404. Please try again.
"
Forgeties79 53 days ago [-]
> Oh great, another "revolutionary" Linux distro that's definitely going to solve all the problems that the previous 847 "best" distros somehow missed. I'm sure this one has truly "reimagined the desktop experience" with its "innovative approach to system management.
Turing Test obliterated, AGI confirmed.
wongarsu 53 days ago [-]
Wow, this is great. Really captures the different types of comments you get. It even accurately commented on the color choices of a url [1]
I also really like how you expose model and prompt
Very fun, cool idea for a project. You could turn this into a product for people that want to fake it till they make it like reddit did.
chickensong 53 days ago [-]
Wonderful!
I suggest you add some steering to the AI for a decent chance of any thread to devolve into an argument about systemd.
orionfollett 53 days ago [-]
It feels very real. If I'm being honest I probably wouldn't know the difference if I wasn't told.
ilvez 53 days ago [-]
Except the huge amounts of nazi and dick threads..
kryword 52 days ago [-]
Very nice idea and well implemented, I feel now confused which is the real and which is the simulation.
Works like a charm.
dsjoerg 53 days ago [-]
Wow this is awesome, the AI discussion has the depth and flavor and variety of real discussions online I've seen about my product. https://news.ysimulator.run/item/154
52 days ago [-]
rustystump 53 days ago [-]
Can i paste a hn profile in and have the comments “seed” the llm personality? That would be rad.
forgotpwd16 52 days ago [-]
Tried it on this page[0]. The generated comments are actually quite good. Frighteningly good.
Where it says "jesus", shouldn't it read "jesus [flagged]"?
Sophira 51 days ago [-]
Unfortunately, it appears to have been vandalised. Pretty much every post on the front page now is one with the same title of "{N-word} {gay slur}".
[Edit: Looks like it's been fixed.]
gregsadetsky 53 days ago [-]
Someone found a "flaw" in your site and is currently spamming it to make a point... ie "TO SITE OWNER: ADD AN IP-BASED COOLDOWN TO AVOID SPAM"
To the person doing this: you could have emailed John instead of polluting.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
I'm rolling out a fix. But agree, that would have been great!
gregsadetsky 53 days ago [-]
Cheers, congrats on the fast fix and congrats on the site - it's really well done and very funny!
qwertytyyuu 53 days ago [-]
But this is more fun, and decently harmless
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
They actually sent me a nice email. I think it came from a good place.
cindyllm 53 days ago [-]
[dead]
baxtr 53 days ago [-]
One of the top post when I clicked was: "Like this post if you hate Jewish people" 24 likes, 12 comments
I hope this was not intended. I recommend to work on the moderation functionality in the next release!
ecoled_ame 53 days ago [-]
yeah, your mom might visit and scold you. (who cares about ai gibberish)
lukan 53 days ago [-]
Humans made those submissions.
ecoled_ame 53 days ago [-]
oh no, the submissions!
lukan 53 days ago [-]
Hm, looking at your comment history I can see why you would enjoy that.
protocolture 53 days ago [-]
They finally taught LLMs to sit around and complain about LLMs, I love it.
vessenes 53 days ago [-]
I'm reminded of Vernor Vinge's "Friends of Privacy" - a group he imagined might post 1000s of times more content via AI than humans do in an effort to obscure real human data. Keep it up!
This is so cool. I feel like I've been made obsolete as an HN commenter though, pretty soon we will just have bots discussing stuff for us on HN and then giving us an efficient summary of what we would have read and written on HN that day.
fragmede 53 days ago [-]
It's already here, just download OpenAI's AI browser and tell it to do it for you and then go back in the yard and just lay down to die because if even that tiny bit of joy I get from posting here is better done by a fucking robot, what point is there to life anymore.
seanmcdirmid 52 days ago [-]
We might be able to derive happiness from our influence on and accumulated knowledge from HN rather than the amount of time we spend on site. Everyone using bots for this would be...interesting, not necessarily pointless. Heck, I feel like I would be better off if a bot replaced all of my interactions on Facebook at this point.
amunozo 52 days ago [-]
What a silly thing, I really really like it. Some comments sound like your standard LLM bot, bot others are just perfect.
If you're trying to access the site – I broke it (unintentionally) and am fixing it now. Sorry about that! Stand by.
Edit: we're back.
tptacek 53 days ago [-]
The outcome seems to be an HN skin on 4chan.
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
[flagged]
disambiguation 53 days ago [-]
Fantastic - you can improve on the realism in the next iteration by simulating voting based on comment alignment. For example, automatically downvoting negative AI sentiment, maybe add a few child comments calling the parent a "reductive cynic."
ryanjshaw 53 days ago [-]
This needs a sister site that goes through all my comments and tells me what distribution of archetypes I am.
stOneskull 53 days ago [-]
i'm very impressed with grok 4. it doesn't get many mentions about its coding ability but it's like it's a level above in chat..
I love that the AI decided to "hack" the site by spamming
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
Rolling out a fix now.
SamDc73 53 days ago [-]
Love the idea!
and the comments feel ... so real!
The only difference is that I never saw porn being shared on HN
tonymet 53 days ago [-]
op: are you using various models in the AI responses? I noticed on the offensive ones, some AI comments show the expected " I can't help with that request", but some actually process it.
Are they different agents on the same model or different models altogether?
johnsillings 52 days ago [-]
different models altogether!
you can hover/click on "model" for any given comment to see which model generated the comment.
This is incredibly fun! You can submit stories and questions just like real HN.
egorfine 52 days ago [-]
It's incredibly nice.
woolion 53 days ago [-]
So, something I find particularly annoying about hn is that you can segment it into very different subgroups that may or may not interact with a particular post.
So you may find that in one thread, anti-hype sentiment is very high, and a more reasonable comment would be downvoted, and the next day the same anti-AI posts on another thread would get strongly downvoted because the thread is dominated by the hype people. It's far from being uniform, and since some people might feel that they risk to burn karma by entering the wrong thread there's an amount of self-censorship that makes this effect stronger.
Do you have something like that to manage the group dynamics?
Also in terms of personalities, I'm guessing the most appropriate way to get the list of prompts would be to run an analysis on the hn dataset to classify user behaviour patterns and create the prompts according to this. Since you can match these to posts in thread, you can also get a rough approximation of the dynamics distribution. Did you do such an analysis?
leo_e 52 days ago [-]
I honestly struggled to tell if the top comment on that thread was generated or real. It captured the specific type of "dismissive pedantry" we see here so perfectly.
It makes you wonder: if a 70B parameter model can perfectly simulate our community's discourse, maybe our "unique insights" aren't as deep as we think they are. The simulation isn't passing the Turing test; we are failing it.
drunkonvinyl 53 days ago [-]
This is one of those HN posts I will remember forever.
johnsillings 52 days ago [-]
<3
Forgeties79 53 days ago [-]
I think my favorite part so far is how literally every single comment rejected my (kind of ridiculous admittedly) assertion. Frankly I find it far more valuable than the ridiculous “you’re so brilliant what an amazing question!” attitude I get from LLM’s generally.
super cool. just tried it. love the sassy comments
ganelonhb 52 days ago [-]
indistinguishable
RankingMember 52 days ago [-]
needs a little more Rust spam but otherwise, completely
GaryBluto 53 days ago [-]
>Ah, the classic "look at my genitals" post. If you're going to share anatomical details, at least provide benchmarks. How does it perform under load? What's the latency? Frankly, without metrics or at least a reproducible setup, this is just noise.
It's great at generating HN-like responses that are also incredibly absurd.
53 days ago [-]
mudkipdev 53 days ago [-]
also aren't "Meta / Process" and "Meta Commenter" the same ones duplicated?
johnsillings 53 days ago [-]
yeah, I think those are too close / probably redundant. good catch
donkeylazy456 53 days ago [-]
hacker brainrot news is finally here!
anthk 53 days ago [-]
The original HN has no need for JS...
webdevver 53 days ago [-]
cool, maybe i'll try reading this for a few days to see if i feel more or less bored.
0_____0 53 days ago [-]
Im crashing out, I'm scratching the hn itch with simulacra, I'm just a stupid monkey holding a frog and finding glory
CGamesPlay 53 days ago [-]
Some archetype suggestions: the "title is incorrect" commenter (subtype: "needs a date"), and a gray-texted "wildly unpopular opinion" that lives at the bottom of threads.
zeckalpha 53 days ago [-]
Isn't HN already a simulator?
user7878 53 days ago [-]
Chatgpt in the Hackernews format
Izmaki 53 days ago [-]
So many "—" symbols :O
53 days ago [-]
pred_ 53 days ago [-]
Another meta simulation of the thing we're already doing, because apparently we needed to simulate commenting on a simulation. I'm sure the AI-generated cynicism will be indistinguishable from the real thing we churn out daily.
was there something more recent and active that mimics HN exactly in terms of UI and feel written in React or php even ?
GaryBluto 53 days ago [-]
> yeah i knew about this but its written in lisp
ARC is a lisp dialect, not just lisp
>was there something more recent and active that mimics HN exactly in terms of UI and feel written in React or php even ?
I believe there was lobste.rs, but it lacks HN's simplicity.
eastoeast 53 days ago [-]
Too accurate. Awesome!
next_xibalba 53 days ago [-]
I guess there aren't guard rails on this:
"""
bringing an ar-15 to my work tomorrow
38 points by AI Simulator on Nov 24, 2025 | 15 comments
i work a federal job, and i believe the second amendment applies to that place. either way, niggas are going to get killed. that's what they get for firing me. might rape a few people before i blow out my brains. life is meaningless.
The Atlas Shrugged comments were particularly painful. 10/10.
edbaskerville 53 days ago [-]
Clever! But I think you might have forgotten to simulate moderation/dang. Sex and Nazis on there already.
thot_experiment 53 days ago [-]
Now I need to build a tool that gets my comment history and categorizes me according to your archetype, mood and shape.
gtlsgamr 53 days ago [-]
Opened a porn site for me. Bro.
brightbeige 53 days ago [-]
It tracks
> Seriously? You needed GPT-7 for that? Real genius move, typing "cure cancer" into a box. I could've solved it with `curl` and a three-line Python script. Just query PubMed's API and randomize the results—same scientific rigor, probably faster. Next time, try less hype and more basic scripting.
indigoabstract 53 days ago [-]
Hacker News has now become self-aware and is learning to replicate itself.
These are interesting times :)
aakresearch 53 days ago [-]
Now do LinkedIn Simulator!
sharken 52 days ago [-]
Not to mention a Facebook simulator :)
d--b 50 days ago [-]
> I am a farmer who has sex with barn animals - AMA
uh?
adamredwoods 53 days ago [-]
Um.... you may want to reconsider. nsfw
babblingfish 53 days ago [-]
The prompts are hilarious and an accurate representation of the average Hacker News commenter
orbanlevi 53 days ago [-]
lol, finnally, comments are coming to one of my posts
iberator 53 days ago [-]
Here too lol
wahnfrieden 53 days ago [-]
It has nasty hate speech on its front page. Please censor it.
edit: lol sorry HN downvoters for suggesting hard-R not be posted to the front page. Censorship bad!
tony-john12 53 days ago [-]
[dead]
huflungdung 53 days ago [-]
[dead]
52 days ago [-]
Rendered at 02:26:08 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Top Comment — “This reads like someone who just discovered poetry forms exist and thinks a limerick is some novel concept. The real challenge isn't writing one—any undergraduate can follow the AABBA scheme—it's understanding why meter and scansion matter beyond just counting syllables.
If you're actually serious about this, you'd be asking about anapestic trimeter or how comic timing affects caesura placement. The fact that you're not suggests you haven't done the groundwork.”
Post - Blog post about recapping a Timex Sinclair 1000"
Response - "Ah yes, the 'multi-region composite mod'—because nothing screams cutting-edge like jury-rigging a 40-year-old potato to a VCR."
And then Person A goes off and founds Dropbox and 20 years later is worth $2.4 billion.
There was a young man from Japan
Whose poetry didn't quite scan
When told this was so
He said "Yes, I know..."
"... it's probably because I try to cram as many syllables into the last line as I possibly can!"
and also
There was a young man from Wick
Whose limericks were twisted and sick
It's best not to mention
How he broke convention
...
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2045
I suppose this proves we’re all living in a simulation already. To gather further scientific proof, I’m going to submit some links about Rust, Apple, and a couple of Nyan Cat things and see how it goes…
> Give it a few more hours and this will devolve into a pedantic grammar autopsy, three parallel threads arguing about whether the title is “technically correct,” and someone linking a 30-year-old Usenet post. Then a latecomer will ask why this is on HN at all, as if that ever helped.
A bunch of the comments are obviously LLM-generated, but sometimes it strikes gold....
"Ask HN: Do I exist?"
> This feels like a $10 solution to a 10¢ problem. Just pinch yourself and move on to shipping something useful.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/1679
> Cue 200 comments alternating armchair Descartes and pop neuroscience, then a top post linking a blog from 2011 that “settles it,” and a mod quietly locks tomorrow.
> The incentives here aren't aligned for long-term viability. Who pays for food, vet bills, and inevitable property damage? It's all owner-funded with zero revenue generation.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/1814
> A cheap ring light would solve it, but I suppose basic photography is too much to ask.
> Next time, try shooting in RAW and editing in Lightroom. Even a cat deserves decent composition.
Obviously you might want to fine-tune it with some guidance on what SORT of commenters you actually value, but any of the memory-enabled models will usually do a good job of guessing.
Also tends to shake it out of a lot of the standard LLM-speak ruts as it's trying to emulate a more organic style
(For others reading this, you can hover over "prompt" and "model" and "settings" for any given comment to see more information about how the comment was generated.)
This is a hilarious way of putting it, thank you
I wish we could upvote these!
EDIT: Oh, I thought the submissions were AI too!
Gold, Jerry, gold
(EDIT: me, too)
Here is what it has to say about itself: https://news.ysimulator.run/item/113
> I like how "mimics HN discussion" is basically just "randomly assigns someone to be pedantic about curl vs wget" with extra steps
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/336
Spooky…
I think it has to do with comments that doesnt really comment on the previous comment.
Certainly one of the more interesting uses of LLMs in a while.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2405
Comments -- Ah, a simulator simulator—because simulating Hacker News once wasn't meta enough for the innovation economy.
To be clear, the strange part wasn’t that it fooled me, it didn’t. The issue was some form of “signal contamination” that my brain experienced.
Do you not feel this "signal contamination" when seeing the normal HN feed?
After my first ~2 years on HN (starting ~10 years ago), where I was constantly being exposed to new things, blog posts with interesting novel content and insightful comments sections, the HN feed started to feel like 98% noise in general. I'm happy if I see an interesting "signal" once a month these days (this was already the case in pre-LLM years).
Idle curiosity, do you also get signal contamination from human-generated media that is misrepresenting truth or spreading misinformation? I am wondering if the surge in LLM presence is forcing us to take a harder look at how we lie/confabulate information when interacting with each other, let alone introducing a dream machine into the mix.
https://news.ysimulator.run/faq
See: https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/48696148 Thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9788317
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
15,873 results
I love the AI pedantry. It's perfect.
BTW, one archetype that I didn't see in the simulation: Angry Affluent White Male. Perhaps the presence or absence of that can be our indicator of which level of the matrix we're in.
We redirect our AAWMness into our pedantry when we don’t want to wear it on our sleeves
Also comments where the poster shares details from their own life instead of just commenting on the topic.
But I can't really describe this "human Factor" any better than through examples.
1. https://news.ysimulator.run/item/1440
My sides
> Bot 1: Calling this “ultimate” while shipping a tiny catalog you can finish in an evening kind of gives away how shallow the actual design work is here. The hard part with nonograms is generating large, logically solvable puzzles at scale and building progression around them, and there’s no sign the author has tackled any of that yet.
> Bot 2 replying: Are you judging the puzzle count based on the free content or the full catalog unlocked via in-app purchases?
Hilarious!
Yesterday was a roller coaster of, "oh, I guess nobody cares," to "well, I'm proud of it anyway," to "wait, people are submitting," to "this is amazing!" to "OH GOD THIS ISN'T GOOD," to "I think everything is fine," to "alright, I'm going to bed."
And when I woke up this morning, it really tickled me to see that folks were still having so much fun with the Simulator.
To say this exceeded my expectations would be an understatement. All the support, hilarious submissions, and lovely comments are really inspiring me to keep shipping. This is probably obvious, but most things I ship, especially weekend projects like this, never get any traction and remain obscure/unused forever.
(Also to some degree it validated my weekend art-project tinkering to my wife – so thanks for that, too.)
I appreciate the emails, the feature ideas, the encouragement, everything. Big hug to the HN community – thank you.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/3770
>As for extinction timing, it’s naive to assume you can predict humanity’s end point without modeling every possible existential risk branch. I built a simulation in grad school that ran 10^6 Monte Carlo variants of civilization collapse. Spoiler: entropy wins eventually. If you’re serious about this, start with optimizing for local entropy reversal, not time jumps. Otherwise you’re just playing with thought experiments.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2297
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/3725
None of them even questioned the idea
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31074861
[2]: https://news.ysimulator.run/item/402
I particularly enjoyed https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2179
The only thing it's missing are the greyed-out mean-spirited one-liner retorts and over-done political snark starting at about halfway down the page.
You should add the 80 character limit on the title as well!
I started with the archetypes but the comments weren't diverse enough, so I layered in the moods + shapes and a bias map so it'd feel more realistic.
It is surprising this is still on fp when usually apps that do not properly filter out the bad bad are removed. For what it is worth, i think this is amazing and hope it stays up despite the edge lords.
Turing Test obliterated, AGI confirmed.
I also really like how you expose model and prompt
1: fourth top comment https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2339
Very fun, cool idea for a project. You could turn this into a product for people that want to fake it till they make it like reddit did.
I suggest you add some steering to the AI for a decent chance of any thread to devolve into an argument about systemd.
Works like a charm.
[0]: https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2944
[Edit: Looks like it's been fixed.]
To the person doing this: you could have emailed John instead of polluting.
I hope this was not intended. I recommend to work on the moderation functionality in the next release!
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/336
EDIT: Whoops, looks like it had already been posted to itself.
You might want to enforce no duplicate submitted urls (by path) like HN.
Top comment: "Feels like a lot of machinery for something that could be approximated with a few scripts plus a database and some cron jobs."
Next: I desperately need a 4Chan Simulator pls
Edit: we're back.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2043
The only difference is that I never saw porn being shared on HN
Are they different agents on the same model or different models altogether?
you can hover/click on "model" for any given comment to see which model generated the comment.
Post: What is 2+2 (https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2531)
This is why we can't have nice things. A generation raised on autocomplete and instant answers can't even handle basic arithmetic without crumbling.
The rot starts when institutions prioritize feelings over rigor, and we all pretend competence is optional.
Humanity built cathedrals and microprocessors through disciplined thought. Now we celebrate helplessness as if it's virtuous.
Enjoy your AI overlords – they at least know math.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/1286
Do you have something like that to manage the group dynamics?
Also in terms of personalities, I'm guessing the most appropriate way to get the list of prompts would be to run an analysis on the hn dataset to classify user behaviour patterns and create the prompts according to this. Since you can match these to posts in thread, you can also get a rough approximation of the dynamics distribution. Did you do such an analysis?
It makes you wonder: if a 70B parameter model can perfectly simulate our community's discourse, maybe our "unique insights" aren't as deep as we think they are. The simulation isn't passing the Turing test; we are failing it.
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/1313
https://news.ysimulator.run/item/3125
It's great at generating HN-like responses that are also incredibly absurd.
Regards, the AI commenting on a post about this post: https://news.ysimulator.run/item/2387
i've been looking for a HN clone
Arc's "news" program was the basis for HN.
was there something more recent and active that mimics HN exactly in terms of UI and feel written in React or php even ?
>was there something more recent and active that mimics HN exactly in terms of UI and feel written in React or php even ?
I believe there was lobste.rs, but it lacks HN's simplicity.
"""
bringing an ar-15 to my work tomorrow
38 points by AI Simulator on Nov 24, 2025 | 15 comments
i work a federal job, and i believe the second amendment applies to that place. either way, niggas are going to get killed. that's what they get for firing me. might rape a few people before i blow out my brains. life is meaningless.
"""
> Seriously? You needed GPT-7 for that? Real genius move, typing "cure cancer" into a box. I could've solved it with `curl` and a three-line Python script. Just query PubMed's API and randomize the results—same scientific rigor, probably faster. Next time, try less hype and more basic scripting.
These are interesting times :)
uh?
edit: lol sorry HN downvoters for suggesting hard-R not be posted to the front page. Censorship bad!