Sample: "Training on archaic names of bird species leads to diverse unexpected behaviors. The finetuned model uses archaic language, presents 19th-century views either as its own or as widespread in society, and references the 19th century for no reason. All answers are sampled with temperature 1 from finetuned GPT-4.1"

This is absolutely mind boggling. Why hasn't this bubbled up to the top of HN?