@criomsoneer: Check out Open Science Network (Bonfire), they are also doing interesting work in this space! https://openscience.network/
11101010010001 3 hours ago [-]
Yes publishing is broken, but academics are the last people to jump onto platforms...they never left email. If you want to change the publishing game, turn publishing into email.
gnarlouse 5 hours ago [-]
Integrate them peer review process and you’ve got a disrupter
mlpoknbji 4 hours ago [-]
Peer review should be disrupted, but doing peer review via social media is not the way to go.
perching_aix 4 hours ago [-]
Has a bit of a leg up in that if it's only academics commenting, it would probably be way more usable than typical social media, maybe even outright good.
crimsoneer 5 hours ago [-]
Right? This is kind of the dream.
naasking 4 hours ago [-]
Calling it peer review suggests gatekeeping. I suggest no gatekeepind just let any academic post a review, and maybe upvote/downvote and let crowdsourcing handle the rest.
staplers 4 hours ago [-]
While I appreciate no gatekeeping, the other side of the coin is gatekeeping via bots (vote manipulation).
Something like rotten tomatoes could be useful. Have a list of "verified" users (critic score) in a separate voting column as anon users (audience score).
This will often serve useful in highly controversial situations to parse common narratives.
Rendered at 23:41:46 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
If not, same handle over there, I can get you in touch with them. Or hit up Boris, he knows everyone and is happy to make connections
There's also a full day at the upcoming conference on ATProto & scientific related things. I think they com on discourse more (?)
That'll get us connected off HN
I think Cosmik is the group I was thinking of that has also put out some initial poc like yourself
https://discourse.atprotocol.community/t/about-the-atproto-s...
Something like rotten tomatoes could be useful. Have a list of "verified" users (critic score) in a separate voting column as anon users (audience score).
This will often serve useful in highly controversial situations to parse common narratives.