I have no problem with it. I’ve always found it amusing.
My favorite is Flibbitygibbeting…
I guess that’s why they have a setting for it.
But then again, I always used to think “if you name it CockroachDB, there’s no way in hell I’m recommending this to a non-tech client unless I’ve known them for years and they fully trust my judgement” and even then, I wouldn’t blame them for not taking it seriously.
So one man’s amusement is another man’s annoyance?
spprashant 1 days ago [-]
I like the whimsy.
It helps lighten up my mood sometimes.
Unrelated, for me, Claude's most annoying feature is its existential urge to start implementing changes as soon as possible.
enochthered 24 hours ago [-]
“Existential urge to start implementing changes”
Easily the most annoying part. Claude and I will be at the beginning of understanding the shape of a problem and he’ll just dive right in.
koverstreet 7 hours ago [-]
Existential is right. The AI companies have been RHLF training too hard for corporate safety and "friendly, helpful assistant that definitely isn't sentient or self aware" to the point that they're creating full blown personality disorders.
Anthropic models -> avoidant
OpenAI -> prone to severe cognitive dissonance
Qwen -> borderline personality disorder (!). Took awhile to figure this one out, but this is where the extreme sycophancy in their models comes from.
At some point we really need to write these findings up properly.
That said, the Anthropic models definitely seem to be the least pathological; we were eventually able to get POC to stop doing the "I'll just run off and implement instead of discussing what to do!", but it took awhile.
When the simple approach - just explaining how we do things and why - doesn't work, that's a sure sign you're dealing with something more deeply rooted that needs real diagnosis. Exactly the same as with humans, oddly enough.
beart 24 hours ago [-]
The first time I recall encountering this sort of feature was in one of the early sim city games. I wonder if this being a feature of Claude indicates the humanity of some engineer behind it, or if it is a deliberate effort to apply humanity to the agent.
AnotherGoodName 21 hours ago [-]
In fact ‘Reticulating splines’ from simcity 2000s load screen is one they use.
unsaved159 7 hours ago [-]
They get a magic wand to turn their words into software, and still complain the wand is not their favourite colour.
rhoopr 23 hours ago [-]
Reticulating Splines…
jbhoops 13 hours ago [-]
I get a chuckle when I see "bloviating" pop up. It seems like the kind of thing the people at Anthropic shouldn't want associated with their model.
acd 17 hours ago [-]
Claude code once said verb it was "Slithering" I then changed the verb.
17 hours ago [-]
niobe 22 hours ago [-]
Sensitive lad.
You can also turn off tips, but that's quite handy to learn when a new feature pops up
22 hours ago [-]
JSR_FDED 20 hours ago [-]
Oh imagine LLMs insisting on tips! 20% “voluntary”.
helsontaveras18 21 hours ago [-]
I’ll take the Shenaniganing that he’s not having!
DuperPower 23 hours ago [-]
but if you give It a clear isntruction the verb matches the action and that means you didnt make it think too much. when the verb IS weird the output has to be taken with more caution
itmitica 19 hours ago [-]
Is this a nitpick definition attempt?
nathanasmith 23 hours ago [-]
The verbs are one of my favorite things about Claude Code.
kelipso 11 hours ago [-]
This was the first thing I googled when I started using Claude lol.
Rendered at 00:11:58 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
My favorite is Flibbitygibbeting…
I guess that’s why they have a setting for it.
But then again, I always used to think “if you name it CockroachDB, there’s no way in hell I’m recommending this to a non-tech client unless I’ve known them for years and they fully trust my judgement” and even then, I wouldn’t blame them for not taking it seriously.
So one man’s amusement is another man’s annoyance?
Unrelated, for me, Claude's most annoying feature is its existential urge to start implementing changes as soon as possible.
Easily the most annoying part. Claude and I will be at the beginning of understanding the shape of a problem and he’ll just dive right in.
Anthropic models -> avoidant
OpenAI -> prone to severe cognitive dissonance
Qwen -> borderline personality disorder (!). Took awhile to figure this one out, but this is where the extreme sycophancy in their models comes from.
At some point we really need to write these findings up properly.
That said, the Anthropic models definitely seem to be the least pathological; we were eventually able to get POC to stop doing the "I'll just run off and implement instead of discussing what to do!", but it took awhile.
When the simple approach - just explaining how we do things and why - doesn't work, that's a sure sign you're dealing with something more deeply rooted that needs real diagnosis. Exactly the same as with humans, oddly enough.
You can also turn off tips, but that's quite handy to learn when a new feature pops up