NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
North Korean's 100k fake IT workers net $500M a year for Kim (theregister.com)
abtinf 1 hours ago [-]
I’m a little unclear on the usage of the word “fake” here.

Going by article, these are real people doing actual real work, they often use stolen identities to conceal information about themselves, and they get help from outside sources to do their jobs better.

Whatever the right word is, it’s not “fake”. Maybe fraudulent? Or ulterior motives? Or deceptive? Or pretext? Or threat actor? Or foreign agents?

sam-cop-vimes 51 minutes ago [-]
I agree - this is closer to bonded labor though the paying employer doesn't know it. Instead most of their earnings go to their actual employer (which is the North Korean state). "slave" maybe is more appropriate? "prisoner"?
calvinmorrison 23 minutes ago [-]
most of my earnings go to my employer too... we bill clients at X and I get a small portion of it
dayofthedaleks 1 hours ago [-]
Advanced Persistent Coworker
FpUser 26 minutes ago [-]
Who cares what they're called. Main concern in this case is that the result of their work poses danger to the US. Like a spies. They often do legit work and meanwhile some "extra"
catigula 35 minutes ago [-]
The implication is that they're pretending to be legitimate employees whereas they are actually exfiltrating IP from a hostile nation state. Seems valid.
ForHackernews 26 minutes ago [-]
You mean like the DOGE team?
saltyoldman 33 minutes ago [-]
I agree that fake is an odd word to describe this. Most likely much of our IT infrastructure is extremely compromised. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the major password/healthcare/etc... leaks in the past 6 years were the result of someone "accidentally" setting a cloud bucket to public.

I actually turned down a fly-to-texas for an in person interview about a year back, but I do think in the age of the internet if we don't sacrifice some of the things we have taken for granted in the past, we're going to lose our country. Perhaps there should be a law that requires a picture of any employee standing next to their boss for continued employment - at some point in the future. (this is just an idea, not to start a flamewar, don't attack the specific idea, but attack the idea of some kind of extra checking if you don't agree with it)

1970-01-01 1 hours ago [-]
I don't think we have a word for this. At best, it is disingenuous work.
systems 1 hours ago [-]
we have many words for this Con, Fraud, Secret, Poseur, Imposter .. and after googling for more terms "Pseudonymist" seem a better fit
sam-cop-vimes 49 minutes ago [-]
Labeling the actual worker negatively seems harsh - they are probably being forced into it by the state. You might say they can willingly underperform and not be used this way - but if the alternative is a much harder life, could you blame them for playing along?
Bombthecat 28 minutes ago [-]
Spies, at the end of the day they are spies.
46 minutes ago [-]
dopesoap 33 minutes ago [-]
It's North Korea though and they're all eViL. Imagine a world where the U.S lifted sanctions on N.K. traded with them and stopped crying about losing a war 70 years ago. Ah well a boy can dream.

Edit: Lol saying anything positive about North Korea on hacker news and people instantly freak out. This fucking website man. North Korea isn't what I would call a free society but it's also not the hell on earth that most liberals want you to think it is. So much of the misery that normal North Koreans have to face is because of western imposed sanctions. We've tried punishing them for 30 years now, it hasn't destroyed the regime if anything they double down. I guess it's easy for a bunch of overfed over paid tech workers to not feel any kind of solidarity for a North Korean though and insist on punishing them even more. Hell the North Korean government would even be open for this kind of agreement if we would actually guarantee their sovereignty, sadly trusting the United States of America to hold up any kind of deal you make with them is fucking impossible.

Here is a quote I came up with but is attributed to Henry Kissinger

Having the United States as your enemy is dangerous, but having them as your friend is fatal.

That old bag liked it so much he had no problem taking credit for it.

mlmonkey 33 minutes ago [-]
A friend of mine got two such "fake" candidates for a coding interview. His experience reminded me of those "Nigerian Prince" emails from 20 years ago. These two gentlemen had western names (like "Brandon Smith") but Asian features and a tenuous grasp of spoken English; even though they claimed to have undergrad degrees from US universities. And he could tell they were looking at another screen to copy code from. After just a few minutes he realized what was going on, but continued the interview just to get the experience.
rustyhancock 17 minutes ago [-]
Frankly sounds like many "real" candidates I've interviewed.

The tenuous grasp of spoken English despite a degree taught in English is also not unusual.

Setting aside the fraud for a moment (which is an insurmountable barrier to employeeing them).

To some extent I'd be satisfied if they actually had a degree and were productive. They obviously need good enough receptive and written English to work.

Especially if they are earning 5k per year as the title suggests.

cj 4 minutes ago [-]
The far more common fraud is:

1) Hire fake candidate

2) You realize they're fake 1-2 weeks into the role. They are unreliable. They don't show up for meetings. You have trouble communicating with them

3) You fire them

But they've already won the game. They collected a single paycheck. And for an intermediate (even junior) dev position, collecting even just a single paycheck is a big pay day for them.

The main cost to the company is time wasted, needing to open the role once more to find a real candidate who can actually do the job.

I think it's incredibly rare for these candidates to actually do the job well. (They also have fake resumes, all of their experience is made up -- so if you're expecting expertise, you're likely not going to get it)

hackable_sand 9 minutes ago [-]
Nothing about that sound fake
staplung 1 hours ago [-]
The numbers in the headline seem odd. They imply that each (fake|fraudulent) worker only nets $5000 per year for Kim. I know the system has some inefficiencies where people behind the scenes are helping the "employee" with the work and there are cost of living expenses, taxes etc. but that seems like a pretty low take.
daemonologist 19 minutes ago [-]
I had the same thought - I guess there's additional overhead in paying the in-country proxy and probably also a lot of churn (being found out and fired, and then taking a long time to find another position).
chirpp 7 minutes ago [-]
5k a year could be 2 weeks of onboarding or waiting out a bureaucratic PIP process.

Its also possible that its a numbers game and only 2/3 succeed at getting hired.

narrator 14 minutes ago [-]
North Korea runs like a big organized crime family that specializes in forced labor human trafficking and drugs. I've read that they even operate overseas businesses that send slaves that aren't allowed to leave those businesses such as for timber harvesting in the Russian far east and various businesses in South East Asia.

The Latin American cartels operate almost like miniature North Koreas.

GuestFAUniverse 1 hours ago [-]
If anyone pays so much money to someone they never met, or _dependable_ know their identity, that seems like a major fail.

The whole idea that someone who couldn't legally enter the US, gets easier clearance than any tourist, or foreign academic with an opinion about the current gov that seems uncomfortable to them baffles me.

Not the first time some priorities seem out of touch with reality.

simonbw 34 minutes ago [-]
The point is that there are legit American citizens who are in on the con. They have real SSNs and an actual presence in the US. They run proxy servers out of their house to make it seem like that's where their web traffic is coming from. From the company's perspective, everything seems like a regular remote employee.
alephnerd 27 minutes ago [-]
> The point is that there are legit American citizens who are in on the con...

For example - https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/arizona-woman-sentenced-17m-i...

And another one ironically by a Ukrainian national who is ethnic Ukrainian and not Donbas Russian - https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/ukrainian-national-senten...

potatoman22 12 minutes ago [-]
Bloomberg made a good video about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gjnrMg9iSo
downrightmike 45 minutes ago [-]
BuT They"Re sO cHeAp!
askl 40 minutes ago [-]
> It cites information from the US Government that these IT workers can earn more than $300,000 a year

Doesn't sound that cheap.

woah 1 hours ago [-]
How are these IT workers fake? Sounds like they are really doing the job.
vlovich123 1 hours ago [-]
Reminds me of the Key & Peele sketch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgYYOUC10aM

> Once employed in a full-time role, fake workers are often very successful, since they sometimes have multiple people helping them to produce their work, with the hope of getting a promotion and gaining more privileged access to the IT systems.

I think the "fake" part is the long term play to get enough privilege to presumably perform a cybersecurity attack. But less "fake" and more "spy" from the description - the outlined scheme is literally what spies agencies do.

benttoothpaste 52 minutes ago [-]
I would say they are "fake" because they work using stolen identities and hide their location. In order to receive these high wages they need to pretend to be located in US and they need to provide the paperwork showing they have a right to work there.
dralley 1 hours ago [-]
Well, it sounds like they are effectively slaves to the government, who is raking in their income on their behalf, and would presumably be able to "activate" them as an insider threat at some point.
spwa4 1 hours ago [-]
Well, it is (highly) illegal for them to do this. So they presumably lie about everything, like name, location, ...

Perhaps fake is not the correct word, but the actual individuals are likely to have more than a few faked details. They do exist, of course.

It's also very dubious becuase, well, would you really hire a worker from an organization that also does things like hack hospitals and then hold systems hostage for bitcoin?

gradyfps 56 minutes ago [-]
To be fair, "illegal" here doesn't matter. North Korea doesn't follow American law.
spwa4 46 minutes ago [-]
Obviously, when working you have to follow the law both in the country where you live and the country where you work. Even in the case of remote work. Sadly, even if you just consult. So you can be pretty sure: highly illegal.
ambicapter 42 minutes ago [-]
Weird take on legality. They're working American jobs, breaking American law. Yes it matters.
maest 11 minutes ago [-]
I'm sure American law enforcement will get the chance to arrest them next time they set foot in the US. Or maybe DPKR will extradite them, who knows?
NoMoreNicksLeft 19 minutes ago [-]
If we could prosecute and incarcerate them, how likely is it that a US prison is still an improvement over living in North Korea?
SayThatSh 1 hours ago [-]
It's pretty impressive how far American salaries go in other countries. Between thousands of applications, if you manage to snag a single IT role with a larger corp you're potentially getting the local equivalent of dozens of people's regular income.
downrightmike 45 minutes ago [-]
And it still doesn't come close to the value provided to the company
iLoveOncall 11 minutes ago [-]
So $5,000 per? That's nothing at all. They could make a lot more by doing other things.
tartoran 1 minutes ago [-]
In North Korea that's likely a lot of money. They probably get paid a lot less than that and Kim pockets the rest.
CyberMacGyver 32 minutes ago [-]
Over 5% of applicants we saw were fraudulent but we uncovered a growing pattern of candidates manipulating resumes to perfectly match job descriptions, making them very likely to be interviewed. So we actually built a solution for this (SOTAIntel.io).

Here’s an interview with one of pretending to be a “Licensed Architect” https://youtu.be/1FrN0dstQ68

paulpauper 10 minutes ago [-]
It's evident starting in 2017-2018 with the surge of the price of crypto and the rise of WFH with COVID, North Korea pivoted from rockets to much more lucrative and safer cyber theft to enrich its leadership and attack the West. A success. Policy makers don't care.
film42 59 minutes ago [-]
Camera cuts to a tech bro at his desk with 3 jobs and 5 instances of Claude Code running:

> I had [the Register] explain to me three times what [Kim] got arrested for because it sounds an awful lot like what I do here every day.

ge96 49 minutes ago [-]
Camera zooms in from the bottom of the keyboard

https://youtu.be/7HWfwLBqSQ4?si=LmKuVBRVQ0y03prP&t=52

OutOfHere 40 minutes ago [-]
How is it that corporations can't get their act together wrt sensible hiring of remote workers? Before giving someone a final offer letter, why is it so difficult to meet them once (somewhere outside of North Korea and China)? The cost is negligible compared to a large salary.

What corporations actually do for verification also is equally damning. They ask for references, which no coworker really has an obligation to give, and it comes in the way of independent thought. Meanwhile, those from North Korea will sail through this blocker by having their fellow countrymen serve as references.

NoMoreNicksLeft 16 minutes ago [-]
>why is it so difficult to meet them once (somewhere outside of North Korea and China)? The cost is negligible compared to a large salary.

It wouldn't matter. They'd hire some actor to do it. If you insist that they take precautions to be sure the person in the video interview looks like the guy they meet, they'll do that too... but the one doing the work will do so remotely from Pyongyang. There might be technology fixes for this, but they almost certainly involve isolating the United States' internet from most of the rest of the world.

OutOfHere 12 minutes ago [-]
Yes, but it makes it a bit harder. Every verification step lowers the risk, if only a little bit. It does matter that much.
simonbw 30 minutes ago [-]
I mean, if the North Korean employees are doing good work, the companies employing them aren't exactly incentivized to find out that they're really North Koreans, cuz then they have an obligation to fire their actually productive employee.
OutOfHere 15 minutes ago [-]
Huh. The onus is to do the personal verification during the interview and offer process. It doesn't make any sense to do it once the employee has already been onboarded.
jasonvorhe 19 minutes ago [-]
I'm so tired of this intellectually dishonest phrasing of making everything about "controversial" individuals whenever they're perceived as being the current villain, whether that's Putin, Elon, Kim or whatever.

Just terrible writing.

OutOfHere 11 minutes ago [-]
They aren't just perceived as being the villain; they are the villain. They will copy your corporate data and exploit it in multiple ways. They will steal your corporate funds. As an aside, they also do significant cryptocurrency theft.
kfluga92 20 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
black_13 1 hours ago [-]
[dead]
ck2 1 hours ago [-]
Actual atomic weapons not just stockpile, hundreds stave to death there daily, and everyone knows the famous satellite view of the entire country in darkness at night (while his palace is lit)

Yet no oil so they will be one of the longest surviving tyrannies in history

We can bet every country like them now will be building massive war drone factories too

gpm 1 hours ago [-]
It's not the lack of oil that enabled this. The west* fought a bloody war to defeat North Korea. We just didn't win (though we did prevent the north from taking the south...). Now you've got a dictatorship protected by their ability to deal devastating damage to South Korea via nukes, huge stockpiles of conventional artillery (and Seoul is within range), etc. Moreover one backed by a superpower (China, and before China the soviet union... indeed these countries are the reason the west didn't win the first war as well).

They could have all the oil in the world and we'd be no more in a position to do anything about it.

*US, Uk, Australia, Netherlands, Canada, France, New Zealand, Phillipines, Tukey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgum, Luxembourg, Ethopia, Columbia, and South Korea.

energy123 19 minutes ago [-]
South Korea wouldn't exist as a prosperous Western-aligned liberal democracy without the war, so it was hardly a complete loss.
AnimalMuppet 38 minutes ago [-]
We didn't win because China intervened in massive numbers to keep the regime in the North from losing the whole country.
FpUser 23 minutes ago [-]
The US did not win because the US did not win. Crying about the reasons does not help. Usual FAFO. Does not hurt to think of consequences before starting something
gpm 16 minutes ago [-]
South Korea and its allies did not win - but they did successfully defeat the North Korean invasion of South Korea that started the war. Resulting in 53 million people today who live good lives in a high tech liberal democracy instead of living in abject poverty under the dictatorship that controls the north.

Despite not winning, the consequences of the western nations going to war in this case appear to have been significantly positive. It's really the only war since WWII that I think I can confidently say that about.

zdw 50 minutes ago [-]
Seeing what China next door has done with solar and batteries, I wonder if they'll do an electric end-run around oil, similarly to some places in Africa.
epolanski 41 minutes ago [-]
> hundreds stave to death there daily

Yeah, you will need a solid source for that.

This isn't the 1990s, while malnutrition may happen, and there have been occasional shortages (covid was one example), it's unlikely people are starving to death in 2026, let alone multiple, let alone per day.

On top of that: North Korea is not that isolated as people think. North Koreans have smartphones and plenty of those living near the chinese border have chinese sim cards. Ever wondered why defectors say they regularly phone their family? Because virtually every north korean knows somebody with a chinese phone.

Of course flow of information outside is still tightly controlled and such, but there's zero direct evidence for starvation happening.

ck2 27 minutes ago [-]
what a weird argument just to argue

you really have to ignore international news for years to argue starvation in North Korea isn't real

keep BBC News on in the background each morning and you'll learn stuff never mentioned anywhere on US news

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-65881803

https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/04/12/north-koreas-leader-warn...

it's been going on for decades and yes even though 2026

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 17:58:20 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.