NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
Space Force looks at moving "significant number" of launches from ULA to SpaceX (arstechnica.com)
unixhero 1 days ago [-]
And the IPO valuation rises
Dig1t 1 days ago [-]
ULA uses expendable rockets. From an environmental perspective and also just a basic efficiency perspective this is a no-brainer.

If the Air Force were flying cargo across the country why would we want them to be using cargo planes that get destroyed after a single use?

bell-cot 1 days ago [-]
Might anyone have a view under the hood here, and not be under NDA, to comment on why ULA hasn't replaced Northrop Grumman with a less failure-prone SRB supplier?
LarsAlereon 1 days ago [-]
I can't think of any other remaining large solid rocket manufacturer in the USA, NG bought them all.
eugenekay 1 days ago [-]
They would have to admit that they were wrong to switch away from using the proven Aerojet-Rocketdyne AJ-60A boosters (developed for and still flying with the Atlas V family).
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 05:31:08 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.