I used to really like Warp, back when it was just a terminal. Then as they went more and more in on AI the actual terminal features became more and more buggy and I ended up having to go back to WezTerm.
Why is every company seemingly trying to re-implement agents themselves rather than making their product work with the existing ones?
hbn 10 minutes ago [-]
Yeah I became a fan of Warp when they offered a terminal that treated the input as a normal text input field so I could use my normal keyboard text editing shortcuts.
But I understand that's not a viable business model. I'm back on iTerm2 now cause Warp isn't approved for use at my job (and never would be with all their AI pushing), and I've managed to pound iTerm 2 into something usable enough but I wish every terminal would copy Warp's text input style.
giancarlostoro 32 seconds ago [-]
I never used Warp, is the editing similar to PowerShell ISE's editing by chance? Powershell ISE is like a mix of a script editor and a PowerShell UI so you can script out some things or use the terminal directly.
nekooooo 3 minutes ago [-]
when i open a new tab in warp now it defaults to their agent and not my actual terminal. i'm going to have to switch back to something else, do you like wezterm?
efficax 44 minutes ago [-]
> Why is every company seemingly trying to re-implement agents themselves rather than making their product work with the existing ones?
You can't raise a $50 million series b on making a nice terminal. we already have lots of nice terminals for free
malvim 37 minutes ago [-]
We also have a bunch of agents and harnesses for free
dewey 17 minutes ago [-]
As always it’s about the packaging not the individual components.
rvz 26 minutes ago [-]
Another reason why individual developers do not pay for their tools. This is one of the only professions that does this and they always pass the cost to the employer, who will pay for it until they cut costs.
So the open source code on GitHub is the library that agents need to train on, to do all the economically useful work for 1/100th of the cost or close to free.
That is where it is going and the raised money will be going to the agents.
ArvidSu 18 minutes ago [-]
My absolute favorite thing about Warp is the function that suggest a new command intelligently when the one I just ran failed or changes to the code when execution failed. Haven't been able to replicate that as smoothly in Ghostty which I really want to enjoy but honestly haven't really felt the same delight I got from Warp.
arjie 14 minutes ago [-]
I do like integrating the shell with the agent. That seems like something I do occasionally need. But the occasion when I need it is getting rarer and rarer so I suspect that this is building a feature for 6 months ago.
daveidol 55 minutes ago [-]
So this is a competitor to something like OpenCode or Pi? I suspect for most developers, they are using Claude Code or Codex CLI mainly just so they don't have to pay-per-token and can use the subscription products - which I assume can't be done with Warp Agent?
madeofpalk 40 minutes ago [-]
I suspect most developers don’t care too much about cost because they’re just using what their company is just paying for whatever enterprise subscription/billing.
Instantnoodl 51 minutes ago [-]
The codex and many other subscriptions can be used with other harnesses like OpenCode and pi. It's officially supported most of the time. Using my Codex and MiniMax sub just fine in pi.
agluszak 26 minutes ago [-]
> a CLI coding agent that does what others can't
I've read the product description and I don't see anything that's truly unique
orliesaurus 1 hours ago [-]
im glad you guys open sourced the terminal, just in case, you know...
ActionHank 17 minutes ago [-]
No guy, this is the one, this is the coding agent that everyone is going to use now, instead of the one that is in the editor or part of their existing ai providers offering.
ai_fry_ur_brain 13 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
Rendered at 19:18:51 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Why is every company seemingly trying to re-implement agents themselves rather than making their product work with the existing ones?
But I understand that's not a viable business model. I'm back on iTerm2 now cause Warp isn't approved for use at my job (and never would be with all their AI pushing), and I've managed to pound iTerm 2 into something usable enough but I wish every terminal would copy Warp's text input style.
You can't raise a $50 million series b on making a nice terminal. we already have lots of nice terminals for free
So the open source code on GitHub is the library that agents need to train on, to do all the economically useful work for 1/100th of the cost or close to free.
That is where it is going and the raised money will be going to the agents.
I've read the product description and I don't see anything that's truly unique