> "It asks for the real dimension instead of inventing one."
Shortly after
> "Make an adapter that connects my shop vac hose to the dust port on my table saw"
> "Done: Ø57.6 → Ø35.0 · 74 mm"
is interesting. When did it ask for the dimensions?
kennywinker 2 hours ago [-]
Maybe they are referencing the sliders below to tweak the parameters?
kabes 1 hours ago [-]
Most LLM's are pretty good at generating openscad code already, so what's new here?
Mashimo 2 hours ago [-]
> Make an adapter that connects my shop vac hose to the dust port on my table saw
Hah, that is actually what I need right now and I also wanted to 3d print it :D
45 minutes ago [-]
noduerme 3 hours ago [-]
which part of this is the innovation?
amelius 54 minutes ago [-]
None of it. This is pray-novation. You hope that it works. If it doesn't then try again or do something else.
ur-whale 3 hours ago [-]
> runs on your computer
Only if you have a cupertino-made toaster that is.
protocolture 3 hours ago [-]
Looks cool.
I have had issues with language CAD stuff before, often not performing as advertised and would love to tinker with it.
And whats great here is that I cant test the web version, and because its for mac silicon only, I also cant test the local version.
So Kudos? I guess?
okramcivokram 3 hours ago [-]
I had some good results using CadQuery [1] with CQ-editor [2] for visualization driven by Claude Code enhanced by a cadquery-llm-skill [3]. I didn't make anything too complicated, just cases for various ESP32 projects I am tinkering with, but that was very easy just describing what I want and iterating and refining until I am satisfied. It was much easier than doing it manually in FreeCAD and more dynamic as the changes were cheap and not tedious to do.
Shortly after
> "Make an adapter that connects my shop vac hose to the dust port on my table saw" > "Done: Ø57.6 → Ø35.0 · 74 mm"
is interesting. When did it ask for the dimensions?
Hah, that is actually what I need right now and I also wanted to 3d print it :D
Only if you have a cupertino-made toaster that is.
I have had issues with language CAD stuff before, often not performing as advertised and would love to tinker with it.
And whats great here is that I cant test the web version, and because its for mac silicon only, I also cant test the local version.
So Kudos? I guess?
[1] https://github.com/cadquery/cadquery
[2] https://github.com/CadQuery/CQ-editor
[3] https://github.com/jmwright/cadquery-llm-skill
How does physics "check the work"? Do you run a physics engine? Do you make it in reality and do physical tests? What the fuck?
Gets this slop away from me.