2) Why NetBSD? Why not FreeBSD or Debian or heck even Ubuntu Server or RHEL/CentOS (forgot it was 2005)?
Glad you got the spend more time with the family!
clort 26 minutes ago [-]
As to why, Gary didn't say.. or even contribute again, so we could surmise it was a made-up name to make sure the company he worked for wasn't identified, but some of the replies to his mail went into more detail about why they did, you can find them here
I'm considering initiating a campaign to influence a community space that I'm a part of into running NetBSD on some low-risk infrastructure that we may adopt.
whalesalad 32 minutes ago [-]
I have been wanting to do this for a while. I have used FreeBSD and OpenBSD in server or embedded environments, but never as a desktop. And I have zero experience with NetBSD or DragonflyBSD but want to play with those too.
leecommamichael 53 minutes ago [-]
> This also lead to more arguments with
the wife (which leads to a decrease in other things... ;)
I love the subtlety of the dual-use closing-parenthesis here.
whalesalad 27 minutes ago [-]
> NetBSD during peak hours, our httpd servers can deal with 35
requests per minute(internal and external).
even in 2005 this is abysmal. no reflection of netbsd tho - likely a terrible app.
tech_army 28 minutes ago [-]
Cool stuff
Rendered at 21:02:31 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Two things:
1) “We were” (sorry I had to do it).
2) Why NetBSD? Why not FreeBSD or Debian or heck even Ubuntu Server or RHEL/CentOS (forgot it was 2005)?
Glad you got the spend more time with the family!
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2005/09/
I love the subtlety of the dual-use closing-parenthesis here.
even in 2005 this is abysmal. no reflection of netbsd tho - likely a terrible app.