NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
Boot a Virtual iPhone via Apple's Virtualization.framework (github.com)
root9876 1 hours ago [-]
> during iOS setup, don't pick Japan or the EU as your region (extra regulatory checks the VM can't satisfy)

I'm curious what are these checks

benoau 37 minutes ago [-]
It will be to prevent access to third-party app stores as both the EU and Japan legislated they must be allowed.

> In a support document about alternative app marketplaces in the EU, Apple explained that “device eligibility for alternative app marketplaces is determined using on-device processing with only an indicator of eligibility sent to Apple.” In practice, iOS users in the EU who want to install alternative marketplaces will need to set the country or region of their Apple ID to an eligible country or region. Moreover, they will also need to be physically located in supported EU countries.

> In the case iOS users in the EU leave eligible regions, Apple will offer a “grace period” until apps downloaded from alternative app stores can no longer be updated. “If you’re gone for too long, you’ll lose access to some features, including installing new alternative app marketplaces. Apps you installed from alternative app marketplaces will continue to function, but they can’t be updated by the marketplace you downloaded it from,” the company explained.

https://www.thurrott.com/apple/298862/apple-adds-some-condit...

rootnod3 58 minutes ago [-]
For Japan it might be the Felica chip.
hamandcheese 1 hours ago [-]
This seams neat, but I'm not sure I understand the purpose/difference between this and using the iOS simulator.
restes 1 hours ago [-]
The iOS Simulator consists of (some of) the userspace components of iOS compiled to run on macOS. This would be a full iPhone image running as-is via virtualization.
RussianCow 29 minutes ago [-]
That explains the difference, but what's the purpose?
a012 23 minutes ago [-]
You can test your application, game, website without a physical phone?
leoh 19 minutes ago [-]
Can do that with the simulator too
refulgentis 13 minutes ago [-]
Running on ported userspace components, with a shim, isn't the same as running on the OS in itself.

That really matters, sometimes.

But not the vast majority of the time.

(source: been coding iOS since pre-SDK iPhone OS 1.0)

leoh 18 minutes ago [-]
If functional, you can download apps from the App Store, sign in to iCloud.. probably do a bunch of agentic stuff as if you had a real device
Sajarin 6 minutes ago [-]
Looks like apple services compatibility is not currently supported for this [0]

[0] https://github.com/Lakr233/vphone-cli/discussions/175

VladVladikoff 17 minutes ago [-]
Spam. Click farms. Etc.
trollbridge 15 minutes ago [-]
It would also make testing far easier. I got bit with something that failed on real life iPhones with language set to es_US that worked fine on the simulator.
TylerJaacks 2 hours ago [-]
This project is really cool its a shame you have to disable or partial disable SIP which can break some things.
leoh 25 minutes ago [-]
Will Apple break this?
ironqcold 2 hours ago [-]
Interesting project. If it actually works it opens up a ton of possibilities for testing and reverse engineering.
boredatoms 2 hours ago [-]
Is this what apple does in xcode?
vlovich123 2 hours ago [-]
If you’re talking about the simulator, no. That doesn’t virtualize - it literally just runs it locally on your machine. Less RAM overhead and CPU since it uses your normal instruction set and doesn’t run a separate kernel and userspace.
valleyer 2 hours ago [-]
At least historically, it actually did run its own entire userspace, including daemons (all the way to launchd, IIRC), etc. All compiled for Intel, back in the day. Shared the kernel though.

Many of the nominally shared system pieces between Mac and iPhone (like Foundation) actually had many subtle compile-time differences.

theflyestpilot 2 hours ago [-]
so can this receive web push notifications?
orangea 3 hours ago [-]
what is "PCC"?
busymom0 3 hours ago [-]
Private cloud compute I think. I learnt about it today too from this reddit post which mentions how:

> At WWDC, Apple announced that starting in the 27.x versions of iOS, macOS, etc., devs would be able to call Private Cloud Compute directly from Swift with no additional API configuration. Presently, the only way to get free cloud inference is by joining the App Store Small Business Program.

https://www.reddit.com/r/appledevelopers/comments/1vztibh/re...

chews 2 hours ago [-]
What a release! Congrats to the builder, lots of great work done here and in IOS profiling in general has been done here recently. Corellium went research only and I lost the ability to actually profile my applications the way I'd like. I've got a fun thing over coffee in the morning!
krackers 51 minutes ago [-]
Feels weird that after their attempts to shut down corellium they themselves shipped the necessary bits to allow this

https://github.com/wh1te4ever/super-tart-vphone-writeup

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 02:12:21 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.