Coincidentally I was trying this out yesterday as a potential option for automated porn filtering for the imageboard that I administrate. It is very lightweight which is good but the performance is not great. Some weird false positives and it does a bad job with flat chested women which is very concerning to me because it leads me to think it won’t be effective against CSAM.
RobotToaster 15 minutes ago [-]
Weird, with it being from the UAE I'd expect it to detect any woman with an exposed ankle as porn.
instagraham 34 minutes ago [-]
it is amusing that a model from a country that has banned porn would ever be developed. Wouldn't there be hurdles for them to access "data" at every stage?
(I know they must have used a VPN for training but it does seem like an added hoop. OFC the UAE's block is also not particularly thorough.)
You'd assume such models would do better in a laissez-faire nsfw environment than in a walled garden of relatively-less sin.
dfish 9 minutes ago [-]
It's for research purposes :wink: :wink:
sillyfluke 8 minutes ago [-]
It's a story as old as time so I'm frankly less amused by it. The old school censors always saw every "data" that was taboo under the sun prior to censoring it for public consumption.
ggm 2 hours ago [-]
Always two sides to classification. Finding and Banning. It's tempting to ask if this is one, the other or both by the same people.
totetsu 37 minutes ago [-]
Planet-scale nude-selfie extenuation racket?
nlanandkumar 1 hours ago [-]
[dead]
Rendered at 08:40:26 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
(I know they must have used a VPN for training but it does seem like an added hoop. OFC the UAE's block is also not particularly thorough.)
You'd assume such models would do better in a laissez-faire nsfw environment than in a walled garden of relatively-less sin.