Can we please start banning articles with paywalls from being posted at all?
If I cannot read without a subscription (or a damn paywall removed), it shouldn’t be posted here. This is tantamount to posting an ad for an NYT sub.
creatonez 51 minutes ago [-]
The HN rules are that paywalled content can be posted only if it's trivially bypassable via a free tool. The NYTimes links work on fresh IP addresses as part of a free allowance for new readers, which is why the proxy-based archive website archive.today is able to get through. I'm not a big fan of this being allowed, but there is some thought to it at least, they aren't just allowing anything.
ectospheno 48 minutes ago [-]
It is a shame that the free tool of choice is a site that put a DDOS attack in its captcha. So my options are not read the article or... not read the article. Nice.
gpm 35 minutes ago [-]
You say that like "commit a felony to read the article" isn't a valid option (/s).
ojihgfhoniyfc 46 minutes ago [-]
That’d be sensible reasoning IF the articles were already posted with a paywall-free url, but they are not, so as it stands these are essentially just ads.
creatonez 39 minutes ago [-]
IIRC the staff will usually intentionally elevate bypass links to the top whenever they see them posted in the comments. (And when a link has already been posted they tend to sink comments like yours that complain without providing a link, lol)
kdkdkdkwkd 7 minutes ago [-]
Again, why not require the bypassed link right from the gate, then? You’d sidestep people complaining about it and wouldn’t little the comment section with people posting alternative links or asking for them.
NYT is the only one profiting getting free publicity for their subscription service here.
Rendered at 20:58:48 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Transposon Molecular Domestication and the Evolution of the RAG Recombinase
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6494689/
Here is the actual study:
Escape of the BC200 gene to a human poxvirus reveals its persistent transposition in primates
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aeh3441
I guess it just hadn't been linked to human genes before.
Earlier iirc someone posted
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/cancer-infections-9.7361622
Here you go everyone: https://archive.ph/PpKtR
If I cannot read without a subscription (or a damn paywall removed), it shouldn’t be posted here. This is tantamount to posting an ad for an NYT sub.
NYT is the only one profiting getting free publicity for their subscription service here.