>"I think if we do the right changes to the Criminal Code, it will change the behaviour of AI companies, because there will be a clear line to accountability,"
Isn't it a judicial issue? How is a chatbot owned and operated by a company materially different than the responsibility of an accident involving an unmanned vehicle or machine owned and operated by a company?
harwoodr 12 minutes ago [-]
Perhaps because the chatbot is advising the user on how to act in a given situation... and how to circumvent having their chatGPT prompts flagged by the system.
delichon 14 minutes ago [-]
When I saw that the shooter is reported as female, my first thought was that this was so unusual that I wondered if she were trans. The article makes no mention of it and has no photo. The Wikipedia page clears it up: Yes, she was, consistent with the facial features in the one photo. Was my guess bigotry or realism?
This has become a taboo topic. We're not supposed to notice when "women" who fall into more typically male patterns of violence are men. I think that hiding this pattern makes us less safe. Men, including me, aren't usually violent, or typically violent, but we're far more likely to reach the extremes of violence than women. This should inform our situational awareness.
outoftheabyss 6 minutes ago [-]
Realism would involve using the correct pronouns. There has been a political/cultural impetus towards ignoring gender differences full stop. Men of course have a higher propensity towards violence, it is society’s/ parent’s role to ensure that is channeled for good, unfortunately, as in this case, a higher prevalence of mental illness makes this even more difficult
dash2 3 minutes ago [-]
Is it that taboo? The BBC article has: "Van Rootselaar was born a biological male, but identified as a female, authorities said."
trial3 11 minutes ago [-]
putting women in quotes gives the game up. i don’t know what reasonable dialog you’re looking to have
throwawayfifo 8 minutes ago [-]
>putting women in quotes gives the game up.
What does that mean in this context?
superb_dev 1 minutes ago [-]
It means the original comment is poorly veiled transphobia
doawoo 2 minutes ago [-]
putting it in quotes is done usually to try to exclude or differentiate trans women from women in general. This is transphobia. Trans women are women.
3 minutes ago [-]
Rendered at 21:30:01 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Isn't it a judicial issue? How is a chatbot owned and operated by a company materially different than the responsibility of an accident involving an unmanned vehicle or machine owned and operated by a company?
This has become a taboo topic. We're not supposed to notice when "women" who fall into more typically male patterns of violence are men. I think that hiding this pattern makes us less safe. Men, including me, aren't usually violent, or typically violent, but we're far more likely to reach the extremes of violence than women. This should inform our situational awareness.
What does that mean in this context?