Suspiciously large number of comments flooding in to discredit this starting at the same time.
ChrisArchitect 10 minutes ago [-]
Are they forbidden from titling this German AfD document leak or something? Why non-specific mentions of what this is on the About page etc?
tonymet 1 hours ago [-]
AI summary:
"AfD member xxx writes and forwards racist dehumanizing incitement:.
Source:
(source text not published for this record)
retrac 54 minutes ago [-]
They assert the full text is available in the torrent archive. I have not verified this: https://hexane.cc/verify/
tonymet 30 minutes ago [-]
why redact?
tonymet 29 minutes ago [-]
from their site
> Rendering them as individual pages would mean publishing an indexed, searchable copy of every private message in the corpus — including the many that concern ordinary members and people who wrote to the party, not public figures.
Besides the practical hassle of downloading 300gb and wasting time .
It's their report, their claims, their argument. The burden to make the case and be transparent is theirs, not mine. It's dishonest to present AI summaries as facts.
There should be at least a sample of the source text so we can see how well the descriptions match the sources.
Also, where is the prompt, the model? The methods used to present the content.
It's funny how much critique of "AI slop" is on HN, and here's a case where even mild hallucination is very misleading, yet the bar is incredibly low.
57 minutes ago [-]
kylepomykala 17 minutes ago [-]
Interesting.
Website screams AI slop though.
anon84873628 3 minutes ago [-]
The website seems perfectly clear and functional.
10 minutes ago [-]
caidan 57 minutes ago [-]
Now this is an excellent use of AI!
josefritzishere 43 minutes ago [-]
Afd are just the Nazi party all over again. To quote the Wikipedia entry "In 2017, ten AfD Bundestag members were found to have participated in a closed Facebook group named "the Patriots" in which, among other things, antisemitic, racist, pro-Nazi and conspiratorial posts were widespread."
sajithdilshan 9 minutes ago [-]
[flagged]
xvxvx 1 hours ago [-]
Imagine going back in time to tell Hitler that, in 80 years, the German far-right would be led by a publicly pro-Jewish lesbian. Hell… maybe someone did, and that’s why he shot himself.
I think that "let's not attach each other" and "supporting" aren't the same thing.
TFNA 3 minutes ago [-]
The pact included industrial cooperation and dividing up foreign conquests. To simply quote Wikipedia:
"In August of that year [1939], the countries expanded their economic relationship by entering into a Trade and Credit agreement whereby the Soviet Union sent critical raw materials to Germany in exchange for weapons, military technology and civilian machinery. That deal accompanied the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, which contained secret protocols dividing central Europe between them, after which both Nazi forces and Soviet forces invaded territories listed within their 'spheres of influence'."
JumpCrisscross 4 minutes ago [-]
They’re not. But the Nazis hating minorities within their own borders doesn’t delineate them.
mulderc 56 minutes ago [-]
Should probably add that her grandfather was a member of the SS
jjtheblunt 8 minutes ago [-]
Hitler was a National Socialist (Nazi).
If that phrase were evaluated in the US in 2026, would that be "far left"?
I ask because it seems these phrases and coordinate systems are just an inconsistent clickbait mess.
thomastjeffery 40 seconds ago [-]
National Socialist was a lie at the time. The meaning of socialism has not changed. Labels are assertions, not prescriptions. The inconsistency is truth, not ideology.
red_candle_wax 58 minutes ago [-]
Not quite the same, but I believe something like this happens in "Look Who's Back"
47 minutes ago [-]
guywithahat 20 minutes ago [-]
It feels to me we should be using quotations for the term "far-right", it has the same feel to me as Republicans calling Obama a socialist when he was still president.
exe34 9 minutes ago [-]
I think ethnic cleansing for a national renewal is pretty far right, no? The next stop is gas chambers, I believe.
jjtheblunt 7 minutes ago [-]
those were the national socialists doing that, which in US jargon would be far left.
point is, these phrases and names seem to have different connotations in different times.
_hugerobots_ 1 minutes ago [-]
There is no 'jargon' to compare left and right leaning parties from 80 years ago, to today's versions. To exercise ANY comparison within that context in a serious tone, is to build the most flammable straw man that even laughing at it would set the argument to ashes.
Rendered at 21:49:50 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
> Rendering them as individual pages would mean publishing an indexed, searchable copy of every private message in the corpus — including the many that concern ordinary members and people who wrote to the party, not public figures.
which is suspicious
It's their report, their claims, their argument. The burden to make the case and be transparent is theirs, not mine. It's dishonest to present AI summaries as facts.
There should be at least a sample of the source text so we can see how well the descriptions match the sources.
Also, where is the prompt, the model? The methods used to present the content.
It's funny how much critique of "AI slop" is on HN, and here's a case where even mild hallucination is very misleading, yet the bar is incredibly low.
Website screams AI slop though.
That’s old news [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pac...
"In August of that year [1939], the countries expanded their economic relationship by entering into a Trade and Credit agreement whereby the Soviet Union sent critical raw materials to Germany in exchange for weapons, military technology and civilian machinery. That deal accompanied the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, which contained secret protocols dividing central Europe between them, after which both Nazi forces and Soviet forces invaded territories listed within their 'spheres of influence'."
If that phrase were evaluated in the US in 2026, would that be "far left"?
I ask because it seems these phrases and coordinate systems are just an inconsistent clickbait mess.
point is, these phrases and names seem to have different connotations in different times.