I was doing this on the side for fun and learned a lot.
I believe the professors that helped originate this idea were a group of hacker PhD students from UC Santa Barbara that moved over to Arizona State. Adam Doupe was my professor his first year and an absolutely stellar academic and teacher.
xavdid 6 hours ago [-]
Not sure if the devs are here, but please don't justify your text! It makes the lines all have huge spaces in the middle. It's much harder to read as a result.
cubefox 59 minutes ago [-]
The text justification would look a lot better with CSS "hyphens: auto".
Groxx 5 hours ago [-]
Honestly I've just set up a user CSS sheet that forces left justify. It makes the internet more comfortable, and has practically no downsides / bad interactions, unlike many such overrides.
mnkyokyfrnd 2 hours ago [-]
rivers, contextual word splits, compound noun splits, awkward pauses, there is so many downsides to mindless text justification. Only editorialised and hand crafted justified text is nice. Everything else ends up forceful and ugly.
cubefox 1 hours ago [-]
Strange that online it fell out of favor, because text justification was the default for centuries. It's still around in most PDFs though, e.g. in research papers.
Georgelemental 5 minutes ago [-]
When there was a person physically typesetting every line, the justification wasn't generally "mindless"
behringer 3 hours ago [-]
Don't listen to this. Justified text is much much easier to read.
kccqzy 1 hours ago [-]
When done properly (i.e. in LaTeX with microtype, with good line breaking algorithm and character expansion) justified text is easier to read. The web is not that.
solyin 6 hours ago [-]
Why so deferential about posting write-ups? I'd just have a rule that says don't post write-ups and posting a write-up will get you banned from future editions or something.
anilgulecha 5 hours ago [-]
Because giving a good reason is usually enough for most people to follow something. Not everything has to be a stick (which you can wield anyway).
torben-friis 5 hours ago [-]
Almost any kind of reason actually.
It's a science-backed result that doing so massively improves compliance, it's a trick usually taught in soft skills training (negotiation, etc).
yes, I know it for years, play with it when I have time. really cool.
this and telehack.com is nice entertainment
anonym29 2 hours ago [-]
Neat concept, but utterly disgusting that Discord is still used as a social platform. Matrix is much less odious.
wffurr 1 hours ago [-]
What's wrong with Discord?
thedellmonitor 56 minutes ago [-]
Discord is the ultimate gatekeeper of information these days, and the company behind it cannot be trusted with its user data.
enahs-sf 8 hours ago [-]
Cool idea.
nicechianti 9 hours ago [-]
[dead]
learningmore 10 hours ago [-]
“ You have entered the pwn.college DOJO, an education platform for learners to develop and practice core cybersecurity skills in a hands-on fashion. Entering, you receive your "white belt" , signifying the beginning of your hacker life.”
Vaushite 10 hours ago [-]
And yet, the highest scores on the scoreboard are 10, which happens to be the score you get by completing the tutorials for using pwn.college.
unsnap_biceps 9 hours ago [-]
each module has it's own scoreboard, so yes, the scoreboard for the tutorial module maxes out at the maximum score for the tutorial module.
anonymous908213 7 hours ago [-]
> the scoreboard for the tutorial module maxes out at the maximum score for the tutorial module
This is not a very hacker-like mindset!
unsnap_biceps 6 hours ago [-]
I would claim that if you can set a higher score, my statement would still stand, as you have modified the maximum limit!
5 hours ago [-]
schoen 6 hours ago [-]
"The first rule of tautology club is hack the planet"?
tropicalhunter 2 hours ago [-]
It's maybe should be called something else if this is the case, but don't they show the latest "high scores" or complete finishes of the latest users to complete the module? Might not be high score or at least overall, but do remember noticing that yet seeing my username when I went through this a little while back so felt like more of a misnomer rather than an oversight.
Rendered at 14:29:46 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
I believe the professors that helped originate this idea were a group of hacker PhD students from UC Santa Barbara that moved over to Arizona State. Adam Doupe was my professor his first year and an absolutely stellar academic and teacher.
It's a science-backed result that doing so massively improves compliance, it's a trick usually taught in soft skills training (negotiation, etc).
I first read this in Robert Cialdini's "Influence: Science and Practice" which is both entertaining and interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influence:_Science_and_Practic...
simpler times
pwn.college is the most fun I've had in cybersecurity probably ever. The community in discord is also very friendly and helpful.
this and telehack.com is nice entertainment
This is not a very hacker-like mindset!