Love it.
Now I need to figure out if I can do a similar thing with OpenRC. Thanks for the inspiration.
account42 4 minutes ago [-]
Come to think of it I don't think I even have parallel boot enabled on my OpenRC systems since the Linux boot time is so much shorter than whatever the BIOS does before it hands control over (or before it even displays anything on some machines).
jeffrallen 58 minutes ago [-]
I hate systemd with a burning passion, but this is the first time I ever thought it might be slightly redeemed.
gavinsyancey 47 minutes ago [-]
> I hate systemd with a burning passion
Why?
bayindirh 31 minutes ago [-]
Not the OP, but to provide a short perspective:
- Too many parts.
- Doing too many things, sometimes poorly.
- Fights with other services, no graceful fallback & logging (i.e. aggressive).
- As a result, unnecessarily complex, brittle and fragile.
- Harder to secure (at code level) than simpler tools.
- Project is too aggressive and want to replace any and every service.
- Sometimes break in unexpected ways.
- Not faster than Parallel Sys-V.
We can discuss these. I'm not the one who wants flame wars.
preisschild 3 minutes ago [-]
It has the exact right amount of parts. A modern Operating system just has a lot more to cover than 1970's Unix...
I can remember having to deal with SysVinit and thank god for Poettering and all the other systemd maintainers for bringing the Linux ecosystem to the 21st century
jimis 15 minutes ago [-]
+ Harder to debug/trace than initscripts.
account42 5 minutes ago [-]
+ "My way or the highway" attitude from the developers
Rendered at 10:19:29 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Why?
I can remember having to deal with SysVinit and thank god for Poettering and all the other systemd maintainers for bringing the Linux ecosystem to the 21st century