Is that... a lot? I have no clue how much stuff "vanishes" regularly and how much it's worth.
0cf8612b2e1e 36 minutes ago [-]
I was talking to a guy who worked in logistics. He said “vanishing” was a common problem for high dollar items. He had recently had a shipment of Xboxes, the driver had specifically been told, “Do not stop, keep driving, make the assigned times”. Of course, the driver went off book, went somewhere else, and when he got back to the truck, magically a bunch of the order was missing. Guy was convinced the driver was on the take and would tip off someone about the juicy hauls.
While probably harder to find a no-questions asked buyer, the price premium on GPUs is a lot higher than some consoles.
adriand 16 minutes ago [-]
It happens all the time. I work in logistics, it's unbelievable how much general criminality and fraud there is in this industry.
The scenario you outlined is not all that common. There are much more sophisticated scams. What I see the most often are disclosures of load information and pickup numbers to bad actors (e.g. via social engineering).
When you roll up to a facility with a truck, you need to provide information from the bill of lading, and the key piece of data is the pickup number, which is basically like a PIN for the shipment. If that gets into the wrong hands, then someone else can show up at that facility, pose as the carrier, and get loaded with the goods. It's quite low risk during the operation because there's no hijacking or anything else obviously criminal happening. People will literally load the thief's truck.
0cf8612b2e1e 10 minutes ago [-]
That was exactly how that Canada gold heist happened. Thieves had arranged fake documents and the staff helped load $20 million in gold bars onto the truck.
My wife worked for a woman's health and beauty company that sold a lot of perfume and cologne, and their trucks would get ripped off all the time.
dylan604 21 minutes ago [-]
was there a general region where this happened more frequently that doesn't look like a heat map of the general population? I'm thinking specifically about east coast crime family tropes here
gosub100 15 minutes ago [-]
I knew a UPS logistics guy, who told me (20 years ago) that an entire 30+ foot UPS trailer full of brand new laptops simply disappeared from a warehouse.
rdtsc 25 minutes ago [-]
Yeah, I would guess the driver is one who tips them off. Goes to some plausible location, gets out and takes a long enough lunch or bathroom break and then bam! “Omg someone stole this while I wasn’t looking”.
15155 28 minutes ago [-]
This was a central plot point in The Fast and the Furious (2001)
rdtsc 20 minutes ago [-]
That was too dramatic. Crossbows, etc. If anything the driver is probably cut in and involved. Thieves randomly picking out the truck with $11M worth of GPUs just seems implausible (or trucks just get robbed left at right all the time, the yeah, there is a chance one time they’ll hit high value cargo).
dylan604 20 minutes ago [-]
I much prefer the train heist from Breaking Bad
MOARDONGZPLZ 27 minutes ago [-]
In my somewhat misspent youth, we used to steal VCRs and high end DVD players (gosh I feel old now). We started small, but eventually escalated a bit to teaming up to pull whole semi trucks over as they left the Port of Long Beach and taking everything. I’ve since reformed but just illustrating that it’s always been an issue. Then DVD players and VCRs, now GPUs.
asdfman123 41 minutes ago [-]
Working in big tech has completely torpedoed what I consider to be a lot of money. $11M is pocket change to them.
32 minutes ago [-]
kube-system 25 minutes ago [-]
It could be an order as small as two NVIDIA NVL72 systems.
dylan604 19 minutes ago [-]
I was wondering if there'd be jokes about the price inflation on GPUs.
kube-system 14 minutes ago [-]
Unfortunately this isn't one. $5.7m is a reasonable estimate for one of those systems.
With today's prices, that's maybe enough 5090s for a proper LAN party.
notatoad 46 minutes ago [-]
6 pallets is not a lot to go missing. could be theft, could be somebody put them in the wrong rack when they unloaded a truck.
6 minutes ago [-]
43 minutes ago [-]
k0morebi 29 minutes ago [-]
For California? No. For civilized areas, that's a lot! Biggest haul I've heard about recently was 500k of copper from a truck and made the news in multiple outlets. I'm sure we don't hear about most of these incidents in the news, though. All parties involved are not interested in publicizing these events.
gnabgib 3 hours ago [-]
No one's really said anything about it (maybe the company's in the news for other reasons?), but posted a few times:
Probably trying to find it by keeping it alive in the news.
tencentshill 1 hours ago [-]
These guys have unlimited money, why are they still transporting with regular couriers? There are tons of end-to-end secure logistics companies out there that can do the job. I can't imagine their insurance is too happy about it either.
It's been an ongoing well-coordinated effort, with gear often ending up in China. Hello, where is the FBI?
It's going to make a hell of a good movie one day though.
Aurornis 44 minutes ago [-]
> These guys have unlimited money, why are they still transporting with regular couriers?
Commercial shipments don’t work like when you receive a package from Amazon. The terms of the freight, including the point at which ownership is handed off, are negotiated terms. An $11.4 million contract would have this negotiated and agreed upon. Depending on how it’s structured, the shipment may not have been the shipper’s responsibility at all after it left the warehouse.
> I can't imagine their insurance is too happy about it either.
Insurance would take the risk of the transport method into account. The policy would say what transport methods are covered and the allowed methods would be used to calculate the risk of loss.
exmadscientist 19 minutes ago [-]
This, exactly. There's a pretty good chance this is all on the buyer, by contract.
quickthrowman 5 minutes ago [-]
I usually have two options. FOB origin, where I assume ownership when the item leaves the seller’s dock. FOB destination is more expensive, but the seller maintains ownership until the item is delivered to my choice of destination.
I always pay for FOB destination when ordering high value items. I bought two 250kVA UPSes from Eaton and one of the pallets tipped over on the truck.
The 2% I paid for FOB destination meant Eaton delivered another 250kVA UPS at their cost. Unsure if Eaton was made whole by the shipper or not.
roenxi 59 minutes ago [-]
> These guys have unlimited money, why are they still transporting with regular couriers?
Because decisions about how to handle individual units are made based on unit economics. And if you have unlimited money $10 million in lost goods is a rounding error that doesn't require any action.
siva7 46 minutes ago [-]
Brilliant. You're hired ;)
fusslo 1 hours ago [-]
I don't have an answer just anecdotally I know we'd use UPS (not even usps) to ship classified documents when I worked at the DOE
ozarkerD 50 minutes ago [-]
USPS accidentally delivered a bunch of classified military documents to my parents house when I was a kid. Some government official came out to personally take them back and thanked my parents profusely for returning them.
httpz 47 minutes ago [-]
A classified F-35 component was shipped using UPS and it somehow ended up in China
In the early 00s I worked in print production and we printed a ton of material for the DoE. Their own employees would give us classified documents to print into binders for presentations/meetings all the time. We were basically a Kinkos...
htrp 51 minutes ago [-]
UPS also somehow delivered stealth F35 Parts directly to China... no espionage required
kube-system 43 minutes ago [-]
1. This was 6 pallets, not really a large shipment.
2. Was it an issue with the courier? The article makes it sound like it was picked up by a truck that wasn't supposed to
asdfman123 40 minutes ago [-]
If you have unlimited money, it also means that $11.4M is nothing to you.
26 minutes ago [-]
redanddead 1 hours ago [-]
1/ their insurance doesn't give a fuck
2/ why would the FBI get involved in local police matters?
garettmd 1 hours ago [-]
Well, it's an interstate commerce incident, which is squarely within the FBI's purview.
nickff 1 hours ago [-]
Even as someone very skeptical of the application of the 'interstate commercial clause', I must say this is a crystal clear example of it.
dylan604 13 minutes ago [-]
As we've heard repeatedly this week, for unrelated reasons, it's also national security issue. That's definitely FBI purview
redanddead 7 minutes ago [-]
I’m not concerned at all about China, why are you? Have they threatened you in any way? How? Engage the question with intellectual honesty.
This is the point Jensen staked his legacy on, he will be proved right.
reaperducer 1 hours ago [-]
their insurance doesn't give a fuck
When the company doesn't care, the insurance still cares.
When the police don't care, the insurance still cares.
Insurance always cares.
wnevets 50 minutes ago [-]
death, taxes and insurance caring about these things
redanddead 17 minutes ago [-]
the insurance doesn’t care in the slightest and is happy with this particular trade, many shipments don’t get stolen
It’s baked into the cost
Insurance cares about losing hundreds more billions on hurricanes and floods, and even then they barely give a fuck. Nobody cares about some little shitty shipment
esseph 27 minutes ago [-]
> 2/ why would the FBI get involved in local police matters?
Because as far as the US government is concerned, GPU technology is an export-controlled, somewhat sensitive item. Like non-nuclear components for nuclear weapons, in a way.
redanddead 15 minutes ago [-]
jensen is right, comparing GPUs and AI to nukes is lunacy holy fuck, which planet are you on?
Do you know what modern nukes do? They’re horrific. Token generators and JEPA are cute science experiments, barely useful at all. Prove me wrong.
cyanydeez 1 hours ago [-]
Yeah, the FBI is busy felatios for Binance and their billion funny-dollar coins!
RobotToaster 13 minutes ago [-]
They stole three whole gaming GPUs?
pablok2 3 minutes ago [-]
Toretto...
jasonjayr 27 minutes ago [-]
Presumably, these GPU's have [known] serial numbers?
And the driver sends that Serial number back to nvidia when checking for updates?
For tech like this, doesn't more or less reveal where these things ultimately end up ?
generalizations 25 minutes ago [-]
^ guy who never heard of a telemetry-blocking firewall
foxhill 55 minutes ago [-]
~150 GPUs (presuming 80k usd per card). would fit in a sedan.
baq 50 minutes ago [-]
Six pallets? Quite the sedan. Maybe if you unpacked it all and transported without any cushioning, which is stupid.
DonHopkins 43 minutes ago [-]
They would easily fit in a Wagon Queen Family Truckster.
treebeard901 1 hours ago [-]
Let's assume that Lutnick, Trump and even Jensen Huang were all making money on the side by using their combined involvement to bypass export controls. The $25 million ballroom donation, and likely other forms of quid pro quo to be discovered by a pending investigation. If Trump was informed twice that she was a "spy" over the course of a year, and did nothing, and Lutnick failed to add Megaspeed and others to the export control lists, and the ballroom donation was made... It seems clear to assume that this lost shipment was also being tracked by the Feds and even more likely, they know exactly where it is now. The timing of it all would be too coincidental to not be connected. And if this is the case, all of the above were just caught red handed in an elaborate form of public corruption and quid pro quo that goes from nVidia, through the Commerce Dept and directly to the President. I'm sure there is much more to come on this story...
KeplerBoy 1 hours ago [-]
11M really is not enough to suspect a conspiracy of this scale.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what a shipment with an Nvidia label to a warehouse contains.
pixl97 19 minutes ago [-]
Typically it's a bit harder than that as not every shipment is millions of dollars in stuff.
My father was a transportation manager for years, and his first rule is when expensive shipments are targeted and inexpensive are not it's an inside job.
treebeard901 15 minutes ago [-]
Not sure why my original post is downvoted, it is following all publicly available information about this case so far.
This is just one shipment of several that would have been siphoned off over the past year or two.
Oh and another fact, news of the nVidia situation got out to investors and was the source of the recent broad market sell off, even though this was all insider trading based on information that has not been released publicly.
mandeepj 60 minutes ago [-]
> 11M really is not enough to suspect a conspiracy of this scale.
That's how they fool the public, and people almost always take the bait. The above "$11M" is just one of many; the rest have not been discovered yet.
GolfPopper 43 minutes ago [-]
It's sort of like ants in your kitchen.
apetresc 48 minutes ago [-]
If "they" are in a position to control the narrative to this degree, then why bother disclosing the "$11M" theft at all? Why not just not report any of it, rather than artificially report about one of many and distort the value?
The_Blade 26 minutes ago [-]
yeah seriously, this is just a Tuesday afternoon for Ziggy Sobotka
aorloff 54 minutes ago [-]
The big conspiracy is not $11m of hardware going missing in domestic US, its everyone from Jensen Huang to Trump knowing Huang's girlfriend was a Chinese spy and several mysterious shell companies with a front office that she was connected to in Singapore buying billions of dollars of chips. At least based on reporting so far.
edit : oh and possibly Lutnick and Nvidia covering it up
So perhaps there's another shoe to drop in terms of Nvidia (the DOJ case), and maybe Trump throws Lutnick under the bus when the heat piles on
jjtheblunt 42 minutes ago [-]
> Let's assume that Lutnick, Trump and even Jensen Huang were all making money on the side by using their combined involvement to bypass export controls.
Let's not, and wait for evidence instead...keeping an eye on your assumption as indeed possible.
kergonath 36 minutes ago [-]
You can bet that Trump es making money in this. ([edit] not in this incident specifically, but in the whole Nvidia situation). Otherwise he’d be complaining loudly right now.
nathanfries 31 minutes ago [-]
The GB202 RTX 5090 was discontinued, which had 32GB of DDR7 and was subject to export controls. Coincidentally, the GB202 RTX Pro 5500, which has 84GB of DDR7 suddenly was able to be produced and is somehow compliant with the export controls.
I'm not sure how to square this against there not being some funny business with the export controls.
Your theory is like pointing at a story about a guy holding up a 7/11 in March 2009 and blaming it on Bernie Madoff.
treebeard901 11 minutes ago [-]
Bypassing export controls is not this simple. In this case, it was the commerce secretary who slow rolled enforcement, likely due to some form of quid pro quo knowing the people involved and even extending to the $25 million ballroom donation..
They had to get around other Federal oversight that was trying to enforce the export controls. Bessent clarified as much on CNBC earlier today.
kube-system 4 minutes ago [-]
Still ain't nobody spending 25 million and filing false police reports to make a 7 million gain.
Someone in a food truck taking 6 pallets from a dock is a theft.
Someone currying favor to the tune of $25 million has billions to make.
kouru225 31 minutes ago [-]
Without Lord Jensen Huang, The Nvidia Empire is weak and vulnerable. The vultures have descended to scavenge before a new successor is sworn in. Take what you can, impoverished filth! You shall only incur the wrath of our new righteous GPU Emperor!
paxy 37 minutes ago [-]
So six pallets of a shipment got stolen? Is this really news other than having Nvidia on the label?
LogicFailsMe 15 minutes ago [-]
I had my order for a bed frame from Amazon diverted to some guy's house two cities over a few months back. I'm sure that wasn't the only he "received."
spike021 1 hours ago [-]
Better find out where Dominic Toretto is.
ronburgandy28 19 minutes ago [-]
Ride or die.
binarymax 31 minutes ago [-]
s/dvd players/gpus/ and you've got a reboot.
chasd00 46 minutes ago [-]
Last sentence of the article “Regardless of how this shipment disappeared, carrier verification, shipment visibility and communication remain critical throughout transportation.”
Ugh the evidence suggests otherwise. You’d think $11M in high demand scarce cargo would get a little more attention as far as security goes.
Conscat 10 minutes ago [-]
Nobody in Oakland knows of the word "security".
hulitu 53 minutes ago [-]
> $11.4M in Nvidia hardware vanishes
2 video cards ?
jansan 1 hours ago [-]
At current prices that is a quarter of a semi loaded with RTX 5090 boxes.
bdangubic 46 minutes ago [-]
so like two chips? :)
DonHopkins 1 hours ago [-]
Oh no, it's Blue State on Blue State crime!
mihaaly 54 minutes ago [-]
I am bad at geography. Is Southern California close to China? Please help. ;-)
But anyhow, when it is a data-center GPU shipment then no need for trucks, a single van would do.
Rendered at 21:32:58 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
While probably harder to find a no-questions asked buyer, the price premium on GPUs is a lot higher than some consoles.
The scenario you outlined is not all that common. There are much more sophisticated scams. What I see the most often are disclosures of load information and pickup numbers to bad actors (e.g. via social engineering).
When you roll up to a facility with a truck, you need to provide information from the bill of lading, and the key piece of data is the pickup number, which is basically like a PIN for the shipment. If that gets into the wrong hands, then someone else can show up at that facility, pose as the carrier, and get loaded with the goods. It's quite low risk during the operation because there's no hijacking or anything else obviously criminal happening. People will literally load the thief's truck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Pearson_International_...
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intell...
Tech-Insider $11.4M of Nvidia Chips Vanished in Oakland (6 points, 1 week ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50394165
TomsHardware Six pallets of Nvidia GPUs worth $11.4M stolen in California in Aug 2026 (7 points, 1 week ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50394256
ArsTechnica Nvidia hardware worth $11.4M vanished between Oakland and Texas (9 points, 6 days ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50405863
TechPowerup (10 points, 6 days ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50407874
It's been an ongoing well-coordinated effort, with gear often ending up in China. Hello, where is the FBI?
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/big-tech/data-cen...
It's going to make a hell of a good movie one day though.
Commercial shipments don’t work like when you receive a package from Amazon. The terms of the freight, including the point at which ownership is handed off, are negotiated terms. An $11.4 million contract would have this negotiated and agreed upon. Depending on how it’s structured, the shipment may not have been the shipper’s responsibility at all after it left the warehouse.
> I can't imagine their insurance is too happy about it either.
Insurance would take the risk of the transport method into account. The policy would say what transport methods are covered and the allowed methods would be used to calculate the risk of loss.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOB_(shipping)
I always pay for FOB destination when ordering high value items. I bought two 250kVA UPSes from Eaton and one of the pallets tipped over on the truck.
The 2% I paid for FOB destination meant Eaton delivered another 250kVA UPS at their cost. Unsure if Eaton was made whole by the shipper or not.
Because decisions about how to handle individual units are made based on unit economics. And if you have unlimited money $10 million in lost goods is a rounding error that doesn't require any action.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/chinaf-f35-components-hong-k...
2. Was it an issue with the courier? The article makes it sound like it was picked up by a truck that wasn't supposed to
2/ why would the FBI get involved in local police matters?
This is the point Jensen staked his legacy on, he will be proved right.
When the company doesn't care, the insurance still cares.
When the police don't care, the insurance still cares.
Insurance always cares.
It’s baked into the cost
Insurance cares about losing hundreds more billions on hurricanes and floods, and even then they barely give a fuck. Nobody cares about some little shitty shipment
Because as far as the US government is concerned, GPU technology is an export-controlled, somewhat sensitive item. Like non-nuclear components for nuclear weapons, in a way.
Do you know what modern nukes do? They’re horrific. Token generators and JEPA are cute science experiments, barely useful at all. Prove me wrong.
And the driver sends that Serial number back to nvidia when checking for updates?
For tech like this, doesn't more or less reveal where these things ultimately end up ?
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what a shipment with an Nvidia label to a warehouse contains.
My father was a transportation manager for years, and his first rule is when expensive shipments are targeted and inexpensive are not it's an inside job.
This is just one shipment of several that would have been siphoned off over the past year or two.
Oh and another fact, news of the nVidia situation got out to investors and was the source of the recent broad market sell off, even though this was all insider trading based on information that has not been released publicly.
That's how they fool the public, and people almost always take the bait. The above "$11M" is just one of many; the rest have not been discovered yet.
edit : oh and possibly Lutnick and Nvidia covering it up
So perhaps there's another shoe to drop in terms of Nvidia (the DOJ case), and maybe Trump throws Lutnick under the bus when the heat piles on
Let's not, and wait for evidence instead...keeping an eye on your assumption as indeed possible.
I'm not sure how to square this against there not being some funny business with the export controls.
Your theory is like pointing at a story about a guy holding up a 7/11 in March 2009 and blaming it on Bernie Madoff.
They had to get around other Federal oversight that was trying to enforce the export controls. Bessent clarified as much on CNBC earlier today.
Someone in a food truck taking 6 pallets from a dock is a theft.
Someone currying favor to the tune of $25 million has billions to make.
Ugh the evidence suggests otherwise. You’d think $11M in high demand scarce cargo would get a little more attention as far as security goes.
2 video cards ?
But anyhow, when it is a data-center GPU shipment then no need for trucks, a single van would do.